Reply to Comments on SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence by Cupit (2016), Gentile (2016), Glackin and Gray (2016), Gollwitzer (2016), and Krahé (2016)

Brad J. Bushman, Craig A. Anderson, Edward Donnerstein, Tom A. Hummer, Wayne A. Warburton

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In responding to the published comments on our SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence, we note that several key themes emerge. In assessing the media violence research evidence, it is more informative and less biased to draw conclusions based on the full range of findings than to emphasize findings from individual studies. Using the full range of studies, it is clear that consuming violent media influences the way people think and feel, and increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. However, when placing such findings into real world settings, it is important to consider media violence exposure as one of many risk factors for violence and aggression rather than as a sole factor. This acknowledgment of multiple causal factors does not make media violence unimportant––it is one of the few risk factors for aggression that can be addressed relatively easily and inexpensively. To this end, researchers are encouraged to now focus their efforts on finding those factors that moderate the media violence exposure–aggression link, and policy makers and professionals who work with children are encouraged to incorporate media violence science into their practices and decision-making.

LanguageEnglish
Pages443-450
Number of pages8
JournalAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

violence
aggression
risk factor
aggressive behavior
decision making
science
evidence

Cite this

@article{80aeee0a55f84640958a963d188abf57,
title = "Reply to Comments on SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence by Cupit (2016), Gentile (2016), Glackin and Gray (2016), Gollwitzer (2016), and Krah{\'e} (2016)",
abstract = "In responding to the published comments on our SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence, we note that several key themes emerge. In assessing the media violence research evidence, it is more informative and less biased to draw conclusions based on the full range of findings than to emphasize findings from individual studies. Using the full range of studies, it is clear that consuming violent media influences the way people think and feel, and increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. However, when placing such findings into real world settings, it is important to consider media violence exposure as one of many risk factors for violence and aggression rather than as a sole factor. This acknowledgment of multiple causal factors does not make media violence unimportant––it is one of the few risk factors for aggression that can be addressed relatively easily and inexpensively. To this end, researchers are encouraged to now focus their efforts on finding those factors that moderate the media violence exposure–aggression link, and policy makers and professionals who work with children are encouraged to incorporate media violence science into their practices and decision-making.",
author = "Bushman, {Brad J.} and Anderson, {Craig A.} and Edward Donnerstein and Hummer, {Tom A.} and Warburton, {Wayne A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/asap.12123",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "443--450",
journal = "Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy",
issn = "1529-7489",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Reply to Comments on SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence by Cupit (2016), Gentile (2016), Glackin and Gray (2016), Gollwitzer (2016), and Krahé (2016). / Bushman, Brad J.; Anderson, Craig A.; Donnerstein, Edward; Hummer, Tom A.; Warburton, Wayne A.

In: Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.12.2016, p. 443-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinionResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comments on SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence by Cupit (2016), Gentile (2016), Glackin and Gray (2016), Gollwitzer (2016), and Krahé (2016)

AU - Bushman, Brad J.

AU - Anderson, Craig A.

AU - Donnerstein, Edward

AU - Hummer, Tom A.

AU - Warburton, Wayne A.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - In responding to the published comments on our SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence, we note that several key themes emerge. In assessing the media violence research evidence, it is more informative and less biased to draw conclusions based on the full range of findings than to emphasize findings from individual studies. Using the full range of studies, it is clear that consuming violent media influences the way people think and feel, and increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. However, when placing such findings into real world settings, it is important to consider media violence exposure as one of many risk factors for violence and aggression rather than as a sole factor. This acknowledgment of multiple causal factors does not make media violence unimportant––it is one of the few risk factors for aggression that can be addressed relatively easily and inexpensively. To this end, researchers are encouraged to now focus their efforts on finding those factors that moderate the media violence exposure–aggression link, and policy makers and professionals who work with children are encouraged to incorporate media violence science into their practices and decision-making.

AB - In responding to the published comments on our SPSSI Research Summary on Media Violence, we note that several key themes emerge. In assessing the media violence research evidence, it is more informative and less biased to draw conclusions based on the full range of findings than to emphasize findings from individual studies. Using the full range of studies, it is clear that consuming violent media influences the way people think and feel, and increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior. However, when placing such findings into real world settings, it is important to consider media violence exposure as one of many risk factors for violence and aggression rather than as a sole factor. This acknowledgment of multiple causal factors does not make media violence unimportant––it is one of the few risk factors for aggression that can be addressed relatively easily and inexpensively. To this end, researchers are encouraged to now focus their efforts on finding those factors that moderate the media violence exposure–aggression link, and policy makers and professionals who work with children are encouraged to incorporate media violence science into their practices and decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978758184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/asap.12123

DO - 10.1111/asap.12123

M3 - Comment/opinion

VL - 16

SP - 443

EP - 450

JO - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

T2 - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

JF - Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

SN - 1529-7489

IS - 1

ER -