Reply to letter to the editor: high‐intensity interval training vs. moderate‐intensity continuous training: the lack of equalization, an ongoing problem

M. A. Wewege; R. E. Ward; A. Keech

doi:10.1111/obr.12586

Reply to letter to the editor: high‐intensity interval training vs. moderate‐intensity continuous training: the lack of equalization, an ongoing problem

M. A. Wewege, R. E. Ward, A. Keech

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	12225-1226
Number of pages	2
Journal	Obesity Reviews
Volume	18
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12586
Publication status	Published - Oct 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1111/obr.12586

Cite this

@article{2d2e099185204c5d9afd783fbdf47c27,

title = "Reply to letter to the editor: high‐intensity interval training vs. moderate‐intensity continuous training: the lack of equalization, an ongoing problem",

author = "Wewege, \{M. A.\} and Ward, \{R. E.\} and A. Keech",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/obr.12586",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "12225--1226",

journal = "Obesity Reviews",

issn = "1467-7881",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to letter to the editor

T2 - high‐intensity interval training vs. moderate‐intensity continuous training: the lack of equalization, an ongoing problem

AU - Wewege, M. A.

AU - Ward, R. E.

AU - Keech, A.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

U2 - 10.1111/obr.12586

DO - 10.1111/obr.12586

M3 - Article

C2 - 28730659

SN - 1467-7881

VL - 18

SP - 12225

EP - 11226

JO - Obesity Reviews

JF - Obesity Reviews

IS - 10

ER -