TY - JOUR
T1 - Reporting conflicts of interest and funding in health care guidelines
T2 - the RIGHT-COI&F checklist
AU - Xun, Yangqin
AU - Estill, Janne
AU - Khabsa, Joanne
AU - Florez, Ivan D.
AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.
AU - Norris, Susan L.
AU - Lee, Myeong Soo
AU - Ozaki, Akihiko
AU - Qaseem, Amir
AU - Schünemann, Holger J.
AU - Shao, Ruitai
AU - Chen, Yaolong
AU - Akl, Elie A.
AU - RIGHT-COI&F Working Groups
AU - Amer, Yasser Sami Abdel Dayem
AU - Akl, Imad Bou
AU - Arayssi, Thurayya
AU - Alonso-Coello, Pablo
AU - Barber, Sarah Louise
AU - Chang, Stephanie
AU - Dahm, Philipp
AU - Falck-Ytter, Yngve
AU - Ford, Nathan
AU - Grundy, Quinn
AU - Hazlewood, Glen S.
AU - Kuriyama, Akira
AU - Lundh, Andreas
AU - Marušić, Ana
AU - Mathew, Joseph L.
AU - Mintzes, Barbara
AU - Mustafa, Reem
AU - Navarro, David Fraile
AU - Nurdiati, Detty
AU - Pieper, Dawid
AU - Saito, Hiroaki
AU - Song, Yang
AU - Su, Renfeng
AU - Thomas, Rebekah
AU - Tokalić, Ružica
AU - Tonelli, Marcello
AU - Wang, Ping
AU - Wang, Xu
AU - Wang, Zijun
AU - Yang, Nan
AU - Zhu, Di
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Background: Conflicts of interest (COIs) of contributors to a guideline project and the funding of that project can influence the development of the guideline. Comprehensive reporting of information on COIs and funding is essential for the transparency and credibility of guidelines. Objective: To develop an extension of the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement for the reporting of COIs and funding in policy documents of guideline organizations and in guidelines: the RIGHT-COI&F checklist. Design: The recommendations of the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network were followed. The process consisted of registration of the project and setting up working groups, generation of the initial list of items, achieving consensus on the items, and formulating and testing the final checklist. Setting: International collaboration. Participants: 44 experts. Measurements: Consensus on checklist items. Results: The checklist contains 27 items: 18 about the COIs of contributors and 9 about the funding of the guideline project. Of the 27 items, 16 are labeled as policy related because they address the reporting of COI and funding policies that apply across an organization’s guideline projects. These items should be described ideally in the organization’s policy documents, otherwise in the specific guideline. The remaining 11 items are labeled as implementation related and they address the reporting of COIs and funding of the specific guideline. Limitation: The RIGHT-COI&F checklist requires testing in real-life use. Conclusion: The RIGHT-COI&F checklist can be used to guide the reporting of COIs and funding in guideline development and to assess the completeness of reporting in published guidelines and policy documents. Primary Funding Source: The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.
AB - Background: Conflicts of interest (COIs) of contributors to a guideline project and the funding of that project can influence the development of the guideline. Comprehensive reporting of information on COIs and funding is essential for the transparency and credibility of guidelines. Objective: To develop an extension of the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement for the reporting of COIs and funding in policy documents of guideline organizations and in guidelines: the RIGHT-COI&F checklist. Design: The recommendations of the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network were followed. The process consisted of registration of the project and setting up working groups, generation of the initial list of items, achieving consensus on the items, and formulating and testing the final checklist. Setting: International collaboration. Participants: 44 experts. Measurements: Consensus on checklist items. Results: The checklist contains 27 items: 18 about the COIs of contributors and 9 about the funding of the guideline project. Of the 27 items, 16 are labeled as policy related because they address the reporting of COI and funding policies that apply across an organization’s guideline projects. These items should be described ideally in the organization’s policy documents, otherwise in the specific guideline. The remaining 11 items are labeled as implementation related and they address the reporting of COIs and funding of the specific guideline. Limitation: The RIGHT-COI&F checklist requires testing in real-life use. Conclusion: The RIGHT-COI&F checklist can be used to guide the reporting of COIs and funding in guideline development and to assess the completeness of reporting in published guidelines and policy documents. Primary Funding Source: The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196372691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M23-3274
DO - 10.7326/M23-3274
M3 - Article
C2 - 38739919
AN - SCOPUS:85196372691
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 177
SP - 782
EP - 790
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -