TY - JOUR
T1 - Representation and processing of mass and count nouns
T2 - A review
AU - Fieder, Nora
AU - Nickels, Lyndsey
AU - Biedermann, Britta
N1 - Copyright the Author/s. This Document is protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.
PY - 2014/6/11
Y1 - 2014/6/11
N2 - Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been considerable discussion regarding gender and number, relatively little attention has focused on countability. Therefore, this article reviews empirical evidence for lexical-syntactic specification of nouns for countability. This includes evidence from studies of language production and comprehension with normal speakers and case studies which assess impairments of mass/count nouns in people with acquired brain damage. Current theories of language processing are reviewed and found to be lacking specification regarding countability. Subsequently, the theoretical implications of the empirical studies are discussed in the context of frameworks derived from these accounts of language production (Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1999) and comprehension (Ta l e r a n d Ja re ma, 20 06). The review concludes that there is empirical support for specification of nouns for countability at a lexical-syntactic level.
AB - Comprehension and/or production of noun phrases and sentences requires the selection of lexical-syntactic attributes of nouns. These lexical-syntactic attributes include grammatical gender (masculine/feminine/neuter), number (singular/plural) and countability (mass/count). While there has been considerable discussion regarding gender and number, relatively little attention has focused on countability. Therefore, this article reviews empirical evidence for lexical-syntactic specification of nouns for countability. This includes evidence from studies of language production and comprehension with normal speakers and case studies which assess impairments of mass/count nouns in people with acquired brain damage. Current theories of language processing are reviewed and found to be lacking specification regarding countability. Subsequently, the theoretical implications of the empirical studies are discussed in the context of frameworks derived from these accounts of language production (Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1999) and comprehension (Ta l e r a n d Ja re ma, 20 06). The review concludes that there is empirical support for specification of nouns for countability at a lexical-syntactic level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938244720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00589
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24966849
AN - SCOPUS:84938244720
VL - 5
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
SN - 1664-1078
M1 - 589
ER -