Abstract
Worker selection is a significant and challenging issue in crowdsourcing systems. Such selection is usually based on an assessment of the reputation of the individual workers participating in such systems. However, assessing the credibility and adequacy of such calculated reputation is a real challenge. In this paper, we propose a reputation management model which leverages the values of the tasks completed, the credibility of the evaluators of the results of the tasks and time of evaluation of the results of these tasks in order to calculate more dependable quality metrics for workers and evaluators. The model has been implemented and experimentally validated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | CollaborateCom 2012 - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Collaborative Computing |
Subtitle of host publication | Networking, Applications and Worksharing |
Pages | 664-671 |
Number of pages | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 8th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, CollaborateCom 2012 - Pittsburgh, PA, United States Duration: 14 Oct 2012 → 17 Oct 2012 |
Conference
Conference | 8th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, CollaborateCom 2012 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Pittsburgh, PA |
Period | 14/10/12 → 17/10/12 |
Keywords
- Crowdsourcing
- Degree of Fairness
- Reputation