TY - JOUR
T1 - Requirement for Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Stent Era
AU - Roy, Probal
AU - de Labriolle, Axel
AU - Hanna, Nicholas
AU - Bonello, Laurent
AU - Okabe, Teruo
AU - Pinto Slottow, Tina L.
AU - Steinberg, Daniel H.
AU - Torguson, Rebecca
AU - Kaneshige, Kimberly
AU - Xue, Zhenyi
AU - Satler, Lowell F.
AU - Kent, Kenneth M.
AU - Suddath, William O.
AU - Pichard, Augusto D.
AU - Lindsay, Joseph
AU - Waksman, Ron
PY - 2009/4/1
Y1 - 2009/4/1
N2 - Performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at centers without cardiothoracic surgery is a contentious issue. Although this practice allows greater access to care, there are safety concerns. The aim was to assess the requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after PCI and characterize patients at highest risk using independent predictors. The study population consisted of 21,957 unselected patients who underwent PCI from August 1994 (Food and Drug Administration stent approval) to January 2008 at a single medical center. Patients requiring emergent CABG (defined as within 24 hours of the index procedure) were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for independent correlates of emergent CABG. Emergent CABG was required in 90 patients (cumulative incidence 0.41%). Indications for CABG included triple-vessel disease, dissection, acute closure, perforation, and failure to cross. These patients had significantly higher in-hospital cardiac death rates (7.8% vs 0.7%; p <0.01) and higher rates of Q-wave myocardial infarction, neurologic events, and renal insufficiency. Independent correlates of emergent CABG after PCI were acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, cardiogenic shock, triple-vessel disease, and type C lesion. Risk assessment based on these predictors identified 0.3% of the patient population to have a 9.3% cumulative incidence of emergent CABG. In conclusion, the need for emergent CABG after PCI in the stent era was low and was associated with poor in-hospital outcomes. Risk was nonuniform, with 0.3% of the study population, characterized by acute presentation and complex coronary disease, at heightened risk of emergent surgery.
AB - Performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at centers without cardiothoracic surgery is a contentious issue. Although this practice allows greater access to care, there are safety concerns. The aim was to assess the requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after PCI and characterize patients at highest risk using independent predictors. The study population consisted of 21,957 unselected patients who underwent PCI from August 1994 (Food and Drug Administration stent approval) to January 2008 at a single medical center. Patients requiring emergent CABG (defined as within 24 hours of the index procedure) were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for independent correlates of emergent CABG. Emergent CABG was required in 90 patients (cumulative incidence 0.41%). Indications for CABG included triple-vessel disease, dissection, acute closure, perforation, and failure to cross. These patients had significantly higher in-hospital cardiac death rates (7.8% vs 0.7%; p <0.01) and higher rates of Q-wave myocardial infarction, neurologic events, and renal insufficiency. Independent correlates of emergent CABG after PCI were acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, cardiogenic shock, triple-vessel disease, and type C lesion. Risk assessment based on these predictors identified 0.3% of the patient population to have a 9.3% cumulative incidence of emergent CABG. In conclusion, the need for emergent CABG after PCI in the stent era was low and was associated with poor in-hospital outcomes. Risk was nonuniform, with 0.3% of the study population, characterized by acute presentation and complex coronary disease, at heightened risk of emergent surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62849121738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.025
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 19327421
AN - SCOPUS:62849121738
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 103
SP - 950
EP - 953
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 7
ER -