Research productivity of sociology PhD candidates at interdisciplinary schools of social science at elite Australian universities, 2013–17: a gender perspective

Adam Rajčan, Edgar A. Burns*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Gender data are presented from a study into sociology PhD completions and student research outputs during enrolment at Australian ‘Group of Eight’ interdisciplinary schools of social science. Findings confirm views and impressions offered by Australian sociology academic leaders. The present data contributes to this wider discussion by describing patterns in the contemporary cohort of sociology PhD students. First, we document a stable gender composition of the discipline in Australia reflective of the literature across several decades rather than a recent feminisation process. Second, we report for this cohort of contemporary PhD sociology completions in Australia women and men publish at similar rates during candidacy. Third, there is no significant gendered difference between students at any level of research output production. Fourth, methodological approaches used by sociology doctoral students confirm the epistemological domination of qualitative analysis in this current cohort of sociology PhD theses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)501-521
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Sociology
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    Early online date19 Jun 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

    Keywords

    • Australian sociology
    • doctoral research outputs
    • feminisation
    • higher degrees by research (HDR)
    • sociology PhD

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research productivity of sociology PhD candidates at interdisciplinary schools of social science at elite Australian universities, 2013–17: a gender perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this