Abstract
I use this paper to reflect upon the ethics and politics of Critical Management Studies (CMS) research. I highlight a potential for problematic power relations in CMS and, drawing upon Foucault's (1976) 'five methodological precautions' for analysing power, I explore these power relations as an effect of the micro-constitution of 'subordinate' and 'superior' subject positions within the research process. Through detailed analysis of a research interview transcript I illustrate how the researched's 'subordinate' and researcher's 'superior' subject positions may be constructed as an outcome of normal and well-intentioned CMS research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 307-325 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Organization |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Research subjects/research subjections: Exploring the ethics and politics of critical research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver