Resettling, disconnecting or displacing?: Attending to local sociality, culture and history in disaster settings

Minna Hsu, Tetsuya Okada, Suguru Mori, Richard Howitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In many disaster settings, top-down responses emphasise ‘expert-led’ solutions that often involve relocating disaster-affected communities. While the intention might be to move people from harm's way and facilitate recovery, failure to attend to local pre-disaster circumstances as well as the interplay between power, resilience and vulnerability within and around affected communities often sees resettlement reconfigure as displacement or disconnection. This oversight may even usher in a new phase of dispossession and disadvantage for marginalised groups (particularly in colonial settings). This paper explores experiences in Australia, Japan and Taiwan to reflect on what issues of local sociality, local culture and local resilience need to be attended to in framing ‘better’ disaster responses.

LanguageEnglish
Pages163-174
Number of pages12
JournalAsia Pacific Viewpoint
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

sociality
disaster
history
resilience
resettlement
community
Taiwan
vulnerability
Japan
expert
experience
Group

Keywords

  • community development
  • disaster recovery
  • local sociality
  • machizukuri
  • resettlement

Cite this

@article{15900e0012bd47a199210fdbc2a3f021,
title = "Resettling, disconnecting or displacing?: Attending to local sociality, culture and history in disaster settings",
abstract = "In many disaster settings, top-down responses emphasise ‘expert-led’ solutions that often involve relocating disaster-affected communities. While the intention might be to move people from harm's way and facilitate recovery, failure to attend to local pre-disaster circumstances as well as the interplay between power, resilience and vulnerability within and around affected communities often sees resettlement reconfigure as displacement or disconnection. This oversight may even usher in a new phase of dispossession and disadvantage for marginalised groups (particularly in colonial settings). This paper explores experiences in Australia, Japan and Taiwan to reflect on what issues of local sociality, local culture and local resilience need to be attended to in framing ‘better’ disaster responses.",
keywords = "community development, disaster recovery, local sociality, machizukuri, resettlement",
author = "Minna Hsu and Tetsuya Okada and Suguru Mori and Richard Howitt",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/apv.12230",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "163--174",
journal = "Asia Pacific Viewpoint",
issn = "1360-7456",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

Resettling, disconnecting or displacing? Attending to local sociality, culture and history in disaster settings. / Hsu, Minna; Okada, Tetsuya; Mori, Suguru; Howitt, Richard.

In: Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol. 60, No. 2, 08.2019, p. 163-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resettling, disconnecting or displacing?

T2 - Asia Pacific Viewpoint

AU - Hsu, Minna

AU - Okada, Tetsuya

AU - Mori, Suguru

AU - Howitt, Richard

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - In many disaster settings, top-down responses emphasise ‘expert-led’ solutions that often involve relocating disaster-affected communities. While the intention might be to move people from harm's way and facilitate recovery, failure to attend to local pre-disaster circumstances as well as the interplay between power, resilience and vulnerability within and around affected communities often sees resettlement reconfigure as displacement or disconnection. This oversight may even usher in a new phase of dispossession and disadvantage for marginalised groups (particularly in colonial settings). This paper explores experiences in Australia, Japan and Taiwan to reflect on what issues of local sociality, local culture and local resilience need to be attended to in framing ‘better’ disaster responses.

AB - In many disaster settings, top-down responses emphasise ‘expert-led’ solutions that often involve relocating disaster-affected communities. While the intention might be to move people from harm's way and facilitate recovery, failure to attend to local pre-disaster circumstances as well as the interplay between power, resilience and vulnerability within and around affected communities often sees resettlement reconfigure as displacement or disconnection. This oversight may even usher in a new phase of dispossession and disadvantage for marginalised groups (particularly in colonial settings). This paper explores experiences in Australia, Japan and Taiwan to reflect on what issues of local sociality, local culture and local resilience need to be attended to in framing ‘better’ disaster responses.

KW - community development

KW - disaster recovery

KW - local sociality

KW - machizukuri

KW - resettlement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070256241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apv.12230

DO - 10.1111/apv.12230

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 163

EP - 174

JO - Asia Pacific Viewpoint

JF - Asia Pacific Viewpoint

SN - 1360-7456

IS - 2

ER -