Resolving conceptual issues in conservation genetics: The roles of laboratory species and meta-analyses

Richard Frankham*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Decisions in conservation biology must be made in the face of uncertainty, due to lack of information. Experimental evidence is required to reduce that uncertainty. Many important conceptual issues in conservation biology cannot be answered by research on threatened species. Research with laboratory species provides a critical link between theory and computer simulation on one hand and wildlife in the field on the other. Such research provides a rapid, inexpensive means for addressing many important questions in conservation biology, especially in conservation genetics. Many examples are provided where conceptual issues in conservation genetics have been resolved using Drosophila. Meta-analyses of data from natural populations provide a rapid, inexpensive means for addressing important questions in conservation genetics, especially when used in combination with laboratory studies. Research with laboratory species and meta-analyses should form part of a balanced portfolio of research investment in conservation biology.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)195-201
    Number of pages7
    JournalHereditas
    Volume130
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Resolving conceptual issues in conservation genetics: The roles of laboratory species and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this