Response to comment on "multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond"

P. Neumann; N. Mizuochi; F. Rempp; P. Hemmer; H. Watanabe; S. Yamasaki; V. Jacques; T. Gaebel; F. Jelezko; J. Wrachtrup

doi:10.1126/science.1168459

Response to comment on "multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond"

P. Neumann^*, N. Mizuochi, F. Rempp, P. Hemmer, H. Watanabe, S. Yamasaki, V. Jacques, T. Gaebel, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our study reported entanglement among single spins in diamond. Lovett and Benjamin argue that three of six described entangled states were not achieved. Here, we explain our choice of entangled states and discuss their importance for quantum information processing. We also show that the eigenstates discussed by Lovett and Benjamin, although formally entangled and routinely generated in our experiments, cannot be used to detect nonlocal correlations.

Original language	English
Journal	Science
Volume	323
Issue number	5918
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168459
Publication status	Published - 27 Feb 2009

Access to Document

10.1126/science.1168459

Cite this

@article{f792ffad4d474f208e9687ef71d9e189,

title = "Response to comment on {"}multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond{"}",

abstract = "Our study reported entanglement among single spins in diamond. Lovett and Benjamin argue that three of six described entangled states were not achieved. Here, we explain our choice of entangled states and discuss their importance for quantum information processing. We also show that the eigenstates discussed by Lovett and Benjamin, although formally entangled and routinely generated in our experiments, cannot be used to detect nonlocal correlations.",

author = "P. Neumann and N. Mizuochi and F. Rempp and P. Hemmer and H. Watanabe and S. Yamasaki and V. Jacques and T. Gaebel and F. Jelezko and J. Wrachtrup",

year = "2009",

month = feb,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1126/science.1168459",

language = "English",

volume = "323",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "5918",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comment on "multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond"

AU - Neumann, P.

AU - Mizuochi, N.

AU - Rempp, F.

AU - Hemmer, P.

AU - Watanabe, H.

AU - Yamasaki, S.

AU - Jacques, V.

AU - Gaebel, T.

AU - Jelezko, F.

AU - Wrachtrup, J.

PY - 2009/2/27

Y1 - 2009/2/27

N2 - Our study reported entanglement among single spins in diamond. Lovett and Benjamin argue that three of six described entangled states were not achieved. Here, we explain our choice of entangled states and discuss their importance for quantum information processing. We also show that the eigenstates discussed by Lovett and Benjamin, although formally entangled and routinely generated in our experiments, cannot be used to detect nonlocal correlations.

AB - Our study reported entanglement among single spins in diamond. Lovett and Benjamin argue that three of six described entangled states were not achieved. Here, we explain our choice of entangled states and discuss their importance for quantum information processing. We also show that the eigenstates discussed by Lovett and Benjamin, although formally entangled and routinely generated in our experiments, cannot be used to detect nonlocal correlations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349202847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.1168459

DO - 10.1126/science.1168459

M3 - Comment/opinion

AN - SCOPUS:61349202847

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 323

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 5918

ER -

Response to comment on "multipartite entanglement among single spins in diamond"

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this