Response to comments on "W(h)ither the deaf community? population, genetics, and the future of Australian sign language"

Trevor Johnston

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In my response to the commentaries made about my article, I observe that the commentators find no obvious errors with my estimates of the size of the signing deaf community. However, most of them are not as pessimistic as I am partly because of the position they take on a number of issues. Namely, the supposed uniqueness of Australia in its treatment of deaf people and deafness; the relevancy of different types of signers to the fate of signed languages; the inevitability or reversibility of declining numbers; the ethics of reproductive technology; and, finally, the responsibilities of linguists vis-à-vis the communities they work with. In my response, I show how we differently interpret these issues and argue for my perspective on them.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)225-243
    Number of pages19
    JournalSign Language Studies
    Volume6
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • Deaf -- Australia
    • Australian Sign Language

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comments on "W(h)ither the deaf community? population, genetics, and the future of Australian sign language"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this