Response to Rosen et al. (2014) "Commentary on 'Critical Flaws in the FSFI and IIEF'''

Miriam K. Forbes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinion

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This is a response to the commentary by Rosen, Revicki, and Sand (2014) on our original article titled "Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function" (Forbes, Baillie, & Schniering, 2014). We address his criticisms and clarify our points further using existing research. We conclude that there are a number of evident limitations to these popular measures, and suggest that researchers and clinicians familiarize themselves with the aim and scope of each measure before use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-502
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Sex Research
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Rosen et al. (2014) "Commentary on 'Critical Flaws in the FSFI and IIEF''''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this