TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to Rosen et al. (2014) "Commentary on 'Critical Flaws in the FSFI and IIEF'''
AU - Forbes, Miriam K.
PY - 2014/7/1
Y1 - 2014/7/1
N2 - This is a response to the commentary by Rosen, Revicki, and Sand (2014) on our original article titled "Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function" (Forbes, Baillie, & Schniering, 2014). We address his criticisms and clarify our points further using existing research. We conclude that there are a number of evident limitations to these popular measures, and suggest that researchers and clinicians familiarize themselves with the aim and scope of each measure before use.
AB - This is a response to the commentary by Rosen, Revicki, and Sand (2014) on our original article titled "Critical Flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function" (Forbes, Baillie, & Schniering, 2014). We address his criticisms and clarify our points further using existing research. We conclude that there are a number of evident limitations to these popular measures, and suggest that researchers and clinicians familiarize themselves with the aim and scope of each measure before use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901337560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00224499.2014.895795
DO - 10.1080/00224499.2014.895795
M3 - Comment/opinion
C2 - 24826878
AN - SCOPUS:84901337560
SN - 0022-4499
VL - 51
SP - 498
EP - 502
JO - Journal of Sex Research
JF - Journal of Sex Research
IS - 5
ER -