TY - JOUR
T1 - Restore or redefine
T2 - future trajectories for restoration
AU - Coleman, Melinda Ann
AU - Wood, Georgina
AU - Filbee-Dexter, Karen
AU - Minne, Antoine J. P.
AU - Goold, Hugh Douglas
AU - Vergés, Adriana
AU - Marzinelli, Ezequiel Miguel
AU - Steinberg, Peter David
AU - Wernberg, Thomas
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Global habitat deterioration of marine ecosystems has led to a need for active interventions to halt or reverse the loss of ecological function. Restoration has historically been a key tool to reverse habitat loss and restore functions, but the extent to which this will be sufficient under future climates is uncertain. Emerging genetic technologies now provide the ability for restoration to proactively match adaptability of target species to predicted future environmental conditions, which opens up the possibility of boosting resistance to future stress in degraded and threatened habitats. As such, the choice of whether to restore to historical baselines or anticipate the future remains a key decision that will influence restoration success in the face of environmental and climate change. Here, we present an overview of the different motives for restoration – to recover or revive lost or degraded habitats to extant or historical states, or to reinforce or redefine for future conditions. We focus on the genetic and adaptive choices that underpin each option and subsequent consequences for restoration success. These options span a range of possible trajectories, technological advances and societal acceptability, and represent a framework for progressing restoration of marine habitat forming species into the future.
AB - Global habitat deterioration of marine ecosystems has led to a need for active interventions to halt or reverse the loss of ecological function. Restoration has historically been a key tool to reverse habitat loss and restore functions, but the extent to which this will be sufficient under future climates is uncertain. Emerging genetic technologies now provide the ability for restoration to proactively match adaptability of target species to predicted future environmental conditions, which opens up the possibility of boosting resistance to future stress in degraded and threatened habitats. As such, the choice of whether to restore to historical baselines or anticipate the future remains a key decision that will influence restoration success in the face of environmental and climate change. Here, we present an overview of the different motives for restoration – to recover or revive lost or degraded habitats to extant or historical states, or to reinforce or redefine for future conditions. We focus on the genetic and adaptive choices that underpin each option and subsequent consequences for restoration success. These options span a range of possible trajectories, technological advances and societal acceptability, and represent a framework for progressing restoration of marine habitat forming species into the future.
KW - assisted adaptation
KW - climate change
KW - evolution
KW - kelp
KW - provenance
KW - synthetic biology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084089029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE190100692
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP190100058
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP150100064
U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2020.00237
DO - 10.3389/fmars.2020.00237
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85084089029
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Frontiers in Marine Science
JF - Frontiers in Marine Science
SN - 2296-7745
M1 - 237
ER -