Retaining the royal prerogative of mercy in New South Wales

Catherine Dale Greentree*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


This article argues that the prerogative of mercy should be retained in New South Wales as a necessary and appropriate power of the Executive. Historically, pardons have provided opportunities for redemption. Currently, the statutory appeals process is limited to cases involving a miscarriage of justice where there is considerable doubt as to a person’s guilt. In cases where a person is guilty but is nevertheless deserving of mercy, the prerogative of mercy is the only avenue available. As a purely executive power, the prerogative of mercy can achieve the aims of the criminal justice system by tempering justice with mercy. The role of the sovereign involves maintaining order, but also enacting some conception of the good, driven by compassion, love, and mercy. Finally, this article argues that grants of mercy should be a matter of public record, for transparency and as a means of demonstrating this compassion to the public.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1328-1361
Number of pages34
JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Retaining the royal prerogative of mercy in New South Wales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this