Abstract
Emmalon Davis has offered an insightful analysis of an under-theorized form of epistemic oppression called epistemic appropriation. This occurs when an epistemic resource developed within marginalized situatedness gains inter-communal uptake, but the author of the epistemic resource is unacknowledged. In this paper, I argue that Davis's definition of epistemic appropriation is not exhaustive. In particular, she misses out on explaining cases of epistemic appropriation in which an intra-communal epistemic resource is obscured through inter-communal uptake. Being attentive to this form of epistemic appropriation allows us to identify unique forms of epistemic oppression that emerge as a result of socially maintained active ignorance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 142-162 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Episteme |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 5 Apr 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- appropriation
- active ignorance
- epistemic appropriation
- epistemic injustice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking epistemic appropriation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver