Abstract
This study considers a frailty duration approach to modelling the life-length of a sample of 360 films that went into wide release at the Australian box office from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005. The analysis extends previous research by considering a range of film-specific covariates relating to distribution, production, consumer signals, and weekly performance. In particular, it is shown that film success (defined in a duration context) responds to previewing, advertising, critical reviews, and US box office-but not to production budget, star power or opening-week screens. The study also reveals that it is appropriate to account for unobservable heterogeneity between films in the choice of empirical methodology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-299 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Cultural Economics |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revealed word-of-mouth demand and adaptive supply: Survival of motion pictures at the Australian box office'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver