Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas

a conservation scientist perspective

Sylvaine Giakoumi*, Jennifer McGowan, Morena Mills, Maria Beger, Rodrigo H. Bustamante, Anthony Charles, Patrick Christie, Matthew Fox, Pablo Garcia-Borboroglu, Stefan Gelcich, Paolo Guidetti, Peter Mackelworth, Joseph M. Maina, Laurence McCook, Fiorenza Micheli, Lance E. Morgan, Peter J. Mumby, Laura M. Reyes, Alan White, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert & 1 others Hugh P. Possingham

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number223
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalFrontiers in Marine Science
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Conservation scientists
  • Effectiveness assessment
  • Failure
  • Marine protected areas
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Success

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Giakoumi, S., McGowan, J., Mills, M., Beger, M., Bustamante, R. H., Charles, A., ... Possingham, H. P. (2018). Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 1-5. [223]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223