Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective

Sylvaine Giakoumi, Jennifer McGowan, Morena Mills, Maria Beger, Rodrigo H. Bustamante, Anthony Charles, Patrick Christie, Matthew Fox, Pablo Garcia-Borboroglu, Stefan Gelcich, Paolo Guidetti, Peter Mackelworth, Joseph M. Maina, Laurence McCook, Fiorenza Micheli, Lance E. Morgan, Peter J. Mumby, Laura M. Reyes, Alan White, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert & 1 others Hugh P. Possingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.

LanguageEnglish
Article number223
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
JournalFrontiers in Marine Science
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

protected area
Conservation
conservation areas
stakeholders
stakeholder
compliance
Economics
leadership
expert opinion
adaptive management
peers
Compliance
case studies
economics

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Conservation scientists
  • Effectiveness assessment
  • Failure
  • Marine protected areas
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Success

Cite this

Giakoumi, S., McGowan, J., Mills, M., Beger, M., Bustamante, R. H., Charles, A., ... Possingham, H. P. (2018). Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, 1-5. [223]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223
Giakoumi, Sylvaine ; McGowan, Jennifer ; Mills, Morena ; Beger, Maria ; Bustamante, Rodrigo H. ; Charles, Anthony ; Christie, Patrick ; Fox, Matthew ; Garcia-Borboroglu, Pablo ; Gelcich, Stefan ; Guidetti, Paolo ; Mackelworth, Peter ; Maina, Joseph M. ; McCook, Laurence ; Micheli, Fiorenza ; Morgan, Lance E. ; Mumby, Peter J. ; Reyes, Laura M. ; White, Alan ; Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten ; Possingham, Hugh P. / Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas : a conservation scientist perspective. In: Frontiers in Marine Science. 2018 ; Vol. 5. pp. 1-5.
@article{c35d4461da514e988d150117494b71a6,
title = "Revisiting {"}success{"} and {"}failure{"} of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective",
abstract = "Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.",
keywords = "Conservation scientists, Effectiveness assessment, Failure, Marine protected areas, Stakeholder engagement, Success",
author = "Sylvaine Giakoumi and Jennifer McGowan and Morena Mills and Maria Beger and Bustamante, {Rodrigo H.} and Anthony Charles and Patrick Christie and Matthew Fox and Pablo Garcia-Borboroglu and Stefan Gelcich and Paolo Guidetti and Peter Mackelworth and Maina, {Joseph M.} and Laurence McCook and Fiorenza Micheli and Morgan, {Lance E.} and Mumby, {Peter J.} and Reyes, {Laura M.} and Alan White and Kirsten Grorud-Colvert and Possingham, {Hugh P.}",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.3389/fmars.2018.00223",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Frontiers in Marine Science",
issn = "2296-7745",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

Giakoumi, S, McGowan, J, Mills, M, Beger, M, Bustamante, RH, Charles, A, Christie, P, Fox, M, Garcia-Borboroglu, P, Gelcich, S, Guidetti, P, Mackelworth, P, Maina, JM, McCook, L, Micheli, F, Morgan, LE, Mumby, PJ, Reyes, LM, White, A, Grorud-Colvert, K & Possingham, HP 2018, 'Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas: a conservation scientist perspective', Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 5, 223, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00223

Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas : a conservation scientist perspective. / Giakoumi, Sylvaine; McGowan, Jennifer; Mills, Morena; Beger, Maria; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; Charles, Anthony; Christie, Patrick; Fox, Matthew; Garcia-Borboroglu, Pablo; Gelcich, Stefan; Guidetti, Paolo; Mackelworth, Peter; Maina, Joseph M.; McCook, Laurence; Micheli, Fiorenza; Morgan, Lance E.; Mumby, Peter J.; Reyes, Laura M.; White, Alan; Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten; Possingham, Hugh P.

In: Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol. 5, 223, 29.06.2018, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting "success" and "failure" of marine protected areas

T2 - Frontiers in Marine Science

AU - Giakoumi, Sylvaine

AU - McGowan, Jennifer

AU - Mills, Morena

AU - Beger, Maria

AU - Bustamante, Rodrigo H.

AU - Charles, Anthony

AU - Christie, Patrick

AU - Fox, Matthew

AU - Garcia-Borboroglu, Pablo

AU - Gelcich, Stefan

AU - Guidetti, Paolo

AU - Mackelworth, Peter

AU - Maina, Joseph M.

AU - McCook, Laurence

AU - Micheli, Fiorenza

AU - Morgan, Lance E.

AU - Mumby, Peter J.

AU - Reyes, Laura M.

AU - White, Alan

AU - Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten

AU - Possingham, Hugh P.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2018. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2018/6/29

Y1 - 2018/6/29

N2 - Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.

AB - Marine protected areas (MPAs) form the cornerstone of marine conservation. Identifying which factors contribute to their success or failure is crucial considering the international conservation targets for 2020 and the limited funds generally available for marine conservation. We identified common factors of success and/or failure of MPA effectiveness using peer-reviewed publications and first-hand expert knowledge for 27 case studies around the world. We found that stakeholder engagement was considered to be the most important factor affecting MPA success, and equally, its absence, was the most important factor influencing failure. Conversely, while some factors were identified as critical for success, their absence was not considered a driver of failure, and vice versa. This mismatch provided the impetus for considering these factors more critically. Bearing in mind that most MPAs have multiple objectives, including non-biological, this highlights the need for the development and adoption of standardized effectiveness metrics, besides biological considerations, to measure factors contributing to the success or failure of MPAs to reach their objectives. Considering our conclusions, we suggest the development of specific protocols for the assessment of stakeholder engagement, the role of leadership, the capacity of enforcement and compliance with MPAs objectives. Moreover, factors defining the success and failure of MPAs should be assessed not only by technical experts and the relevant authorities, but also by other stakeholder groups whose compliance is critical for the successful functioning of an MPA. These factors should be considered along with appropriate ecological, social, and economic data and then incorporated into adaptive management to improve MPA effectiveness.

KW - Conservation scientists

KW - Effectiveness assessment

KW - Failure

KW - Marine protected areas

KW - Stakeholder engagement

KW - Success

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049324802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fmars.2018.00223

DO - 10.3389/fmars.2018.00223

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Frontiers in Marine Science

JF - Frontiers in Marine Science

SN - 2296-7745

M1 - 223

ER -