Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States: Robin Archer, Why Is There no Labor Party in the United States? The United States and Australia Compared (Princeton University Press, 2007)

Lloyd Cox

doi:10.1177/0725513609353716

Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States: Robin Archer, Why Is There no Labor Party in the United States? The United States and Australia Compared (Princeton University Press, 2007)

Lloyd Cox^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	168-178
Number of pages	11
Journal	Thesis Eleven
Volume	100
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513609353716
Publication status	Published - 2010

Access to Document

10.1177/0725513609353716

Cite this

@article{7563180771b446bf863e17cfae8336cf,

title = "Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States: Robin Archer, Why Is There no Labor Party in the United States? The United States and Australia Compared (Princeton University Press, 2007)",

author = "Lloyd Cox",

year = "2010",

doi = "10.1177/0725513609353716",

language = "English",

volume = "100",

pages = "168--178",

journal = "Thesis Eleven",

issn = "0725-5136",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States

T2 - Robin Archer, Why Is There no Labor Party in the United States? The United States and Australia Compared (Princeton University Press, 2007)

AU - Cox, Lloyd

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77950130480

U2 - 10.1177/0725513609353716

DO - 10.1177/0725513609353716

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77950130480

SN - 0725-5136

VL - 100

SP - 168

EP - 178

JO - Thesis Eleven

JF - Thesis Eleven

IS - 1

ER -

Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States: Robin Archer, Why Is There no Labor Party in the United States? The United States and Australia Compared (Princeton University Press, 2007)

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this