Risk perception, preparedness and response of livestock producers to bushfires

A South Australian case study

Bradley Smith, Melanie Taylor, Kirrilly Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)


Animal ownership has been shown to be a risk factor for the survival of humans during emergencies and natural disasters largely due to evacuation failures. For livestock producers, it is often impossible to evacuate their animals given the need to ensure the safety of all persons, property (e.g. dwellings, equipment, paddocks), pets, and the welfare of their stock. To determine their use of information and warnings, and their planning and preparedness behaviour, 41 livestock producers from three field sites around rural South Australia that were threatened or impacted by significant bushfires in January 2014 were interviewed. The majority had a low level of concern for bushfire threat, with almost all opting to 'stay and defend' their property. Few had formally written 'bushfire risk management plans', adequate insurance for livestock, a contingency plan, or used information resources. However, they reported multiple other routine and ordinary practices contributing to their bushfire preparedness. Such activities used a more 'common sense' approach, conducted as part of everyday property management practices and farming culture. It is clear that livestock producers have different needs before and during bushfires, and have a different perception of risk than other animal owners or rural dwellers in general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-42
Number of pages5
JournalAustralian Journal of Emergency Management
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Risk perception, preparedness and response of livestock producers to bushfires: A South Australian case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this