Romantic and enlightenment legacies: Habermas and the post-modern critics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Wisdom, Hegel famously said, only flies at dusk. For many, the evening of the liberal-democratic nation state appears to be descending in a globalizing world. This disturbing prospect invites urgent reflection on which of the potentials of this fading order ought to be carried forward. In this climate of review and reassessment, discussions that had seemed done with re-surface sharpened by fresh purpose. The following paper attempts to put new light on a once vigorous dispute between Habermas and his post-modern critics over how best to weigh-up utopian energies at play in a liberal-democratic present. This was a contest distinguished by its all-or-nothing temper: either democratic Enlightenment with its commitment to rational solidarities or a Romantic enthusiasm for unreconciled particularities. I will argue that the stalemate between these two totalizing descriptions of the emancipatory potentials of modernizing processes needs to be unblocked and the debate put into motion once again. It will be argued that each offers a framework adequate to the description of only certain kinds of cultural needs. Alone, neither offers appropriate recognition of the ambiguous character of the distinctive hopes and expectations embedded in liberal democracies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages68-90
Number of pages23
JournalContemporary Political Theory
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

critic
wisdom
nation state
solidarity
climate
commitment
democracy
energy
present

Keywords

  • Romanticism
  • Enlightenment
  • Habermas
  • post-modernism

Cite this

@article{bba6b8f3688c4e0ebb0a5582ad696295,
title = "Romantic and enlightenment legacies: Habermas and the post-modern critics",
abstract = "Wisdom, Hegel famously said, only flies at dusk. For many, the evening of the liberal-democratic nation state appears to be descending in a globalizing world. This disturbing prospect invites urgent reflection on which of the potentials of this fading order ought to be carried forward. In this climate of review and reassessment, discussions that had seemed done with re-surface sharpened by fresh purpose. The following paper attempts to put new light on a once vigorous dispute between Habermas and his post-modern critics over how best to weigh-up utopian energies at play in a liberal-democratic present. This was a contest distinguished by its all-or-nothing temper: either democratic Enlightenment with its commitment to rational solidarities or a Romantic enthusiasm for unreconciled particularities. I will argue that the stalemate between these two totalizing descriptions of the emancipatory potentials of modernizing processes needs to be unblocked and the debate put into motion once again. It will be argued that each offers a framework adequate to the description of only certain kinds of cultural needs. Alone, neither offers appropriate recognition of the ambiguous character of the distinctive hopes and expectations embedded in liberal democracies.",
keywords = "Romanticism, Enlightenment, Habermas, post-modernism",
author = "Pauline Johnson",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300166",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "68--90",
journal = "Contemporary Political Theory",
issn = "1470-8914",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "1",

}

Romantic and enlightenment legacies : Habermas and the post-modern critics. / Johnson, Pauline.

In: Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2006, p. 68-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Romantic and enlightenment legacies

T2 - Contemporary Political Theory

AU - Johnson, Pauline

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Wisdom, Hegel famously said, only flies at dusk. For many, the evening of the liberal-democratic nation state appears to be descending in a globalizing world. This disturbing prospect invites urgent reflection on which of the potentials of this fading order ought to be carried forward. In this climate of review and reassessment, discussions that had seemed done with re-surface sharpened by fresh purpose. The following paper attempts to put new light on a once vigorous dispute between Habermas and his post-modern critics over how best to weigh-up utopian energies at play in a liberal-democratic present. This was a contest distinguished by its all-or-nothing temper: either democratic Enlightenment with its commitment to rational solidarities or a Romantic enthusiasm for unreconciled particularities. I will argue that the stalemate between these two totalizing descriptions of the emancipatory potentials of modernizing processes needs to be unblocked and the debate put into motion once again. It will be argued that each offers a framework adequate to the description of only certain kinds of cultural needs. Alone, neither offers appropriate recognition of the ambiguous character of the distinctive hopes and expectations embedded in liberal democracies.

AB - Wisdom, Hegel famously said, only flies at dusk. For many, the evening of the liberal-democratic nation state appears to be descending in a globalizing world. This disturbing prospect invites urgent reflection on which of the potentials of this fading order ought to be carried forward. In this climate of review and reassessment, discussions that had seemed done with re-surface sharpened by fresh purpose. The following paper attempts to put new light on a once vigorous dispute between Habermas and his post-modern critics over how best to weigh-up utopian energies at play in a liberal-democratic present. This was a contest distinguished by its all-or-nothing temper: either democratic Enlightenment with its commitment to rational solidarities or a Romantic enthusiasm for unreconciled particularities. I will argue that the stalemate between these two totalizing descriptions of the emancipatory potentials of modernizing processes needs to be unblocked and the debate put into motion once again. It will be argued that each offers a framework adequate to the description of only certain kinds of cultural needs. Alone, neither offers appropriate recognition of the ambiguous character of the distinctive hopes and expectations embedded in liberal democracies.

KW - Romanticism

KW - Enlightenment

KW - Habermas

KW - post-modernism

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300166

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300166

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 68

EP - 90

JO - Contemporary Political Theory

JF - Contemporary Political Theory

SN - 1470-8914

IS - 1

ER -