Roses are red, violets are blue - so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds

Rhiannon L. Dalrymple, Francis K C Hui, Habacuc Flores-Moreno, Darrell J. Kemp, Angela T. Moles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

After years of qualitative and subjective study, quantitative colour science is now enabling rapid measurement, analysis and comparison of colour traits. However, it has not been determined how many replicates one needs to accurately quantify a species' colours for studies aimed at broad cross-species trait comparison. We address this major methodological knowledge gap. We first quantified and assessed the variance in colour within and between species. Reflectance spectra of flowers from ten plant species and plumage of 20 bird species were measured using a spectrometer, and reflectance (i.e. brightness) and tetrahedral colour-space coordinates were calculated. analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses indicate that there is far more variation in the colours of birds and flowers between species (>77%) than within species. A Mean Absolute Deviation from the Mean test was applied to indicate the sampling replication required for each species. Tetrahedral coordinates were sampled precisely with only one individual per species. Greater replication was needed to sample reflectance with the desired precision, particularly for darker coloured species. Our findings will allow researchers to allocate their sampling effort in a way that maximises the precision of their colour data collection. The fact that only a few replicates per species are necessary will greatly facilitate broad cross-species comparisons of colour in the future.

LanguageEnglish
Pages69-81
Number of pages13
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume114
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

flower
Rosa
bird
flowers
color
birds
reflectance
plumage
spectrometers
sampling
variance analysis
analysis of variance
researchers
spectrometer
testing
comparison

Cite this

Dalrymple, Rhiannon L. ; Hui, Francis K C ; Flores-Moreno, Habacuc ; Kemp, Darrell J. ; Moles, Angela T. / Roses are red, violets are blue - so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds. In: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2015 ; Vol. 114, No. 1. pp. 69-81.
@article{22f458aa673b42f3843ef421a56248c3,
title = "Roses are red, violets are blue - so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds",
abstract = "After years of qualitative and subjective study, quantitative colour science is now enabling rapid measurement, analysis and comparison of colour traits. However, it has not been determined how many replicates one needs to accurately quantify a species' colours for studies aimed at broad cross-species trait comparison. We address this major methodological knowledge gap. We first quantified and assessed the variance in colour within and between species. Reflectance spectra of flowers from ten plant species and plumage of 20 bird species were measured using a spectrometer, and reflectance (i.e. brightness) and tetrahedral colour-space coordinates were calculated. analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses indicate that there is far more variation in the colours of birds and flowers between species (>77{\%}) than within species. A Mean Absolute Deviation from the Mean test was applied to indicate the sampling replication required for each species. Tetrahedral coordinates were sampled precisely with only one individual per species. Greater replication was needed to sample reflectance with the desired precision, particularly for darker coloured species. Our findings will allow researchers to allocate their sampling effort in a way that maximises the precision of their colour data collection. The fact that only a few replicates per species are necessary will greatly facilitate broad cross-species comparisons of colour in the future.",
author = "Dalrymple, {Rhiannon L.} and Hui, {Francis K C} and Habacuc Flores-Moreno and Kemp, {Darrell J.} and Moles, {Angela T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bij.12402",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "69--81",
journal = "Biological Journal of the Linnean Society",
issn = "0024-4066",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Roses are red, violets are blue - so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds. / Dalrymple, Rhiannon L.; Hui, Francis K C; Flores-Moreno, Habacuc; Kemp, Darrell J.; Moles, Angela T.

In: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 114, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 69-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roses are red, violets are blue - so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds

AU - Dalrymple, Rhiannon L.

AU - Hui, Francis K C

AU - Flores-Moreno, Habacuc

AU - Kemp, Darrell J.

AU - Moles, Angela T.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - After years of qualitative and subjective study, quantitative colour science is now enabling rapid measurement, analysis and comparison of colour traits. However, it has not been determined how many replicates one needs to accurately quantify a species' colours for studies aimed at broad cross-species trait comparison. We address this major methodological knowledge gap. We first quantified and assessed the variance in colour within and between species. Reflectance spectra of flowers from ten plant species and plumage of 20 bird species were measured using a spectrometer, and reflectance (i.e. brightness) and tetrahedral colour-space coordinates were calculated. analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses indicate that there is far more variation in the colours of birds and flowers between species (>77%) than within species. A Mean Absolute Deviation from the Mean test was applied to indicate the sampling replication required for each species. Tetrahedral coordinates were sampled precisely with only one individual per species. Greater replication was needed to sample reflectance with the desired precision, particularly for darker coloured species. Our findings will allow researchers to allocate their sampling effort in a way that maximises the precision of their colour data collection. The fact that only a few replicates per species are necessary will greatly facilitate broad cross-species comparisons of colour in the future.

AB - After years of qualitative and subjective study, quantitative colour science is now enabling rapid measurement, analysis and comparison of colour traits. However, it has not been determined how many replicates one needs to accurately quantify a species' colours for studies aimed at broad cross-species trait comparison. We address this major methodological knowledge gap. We first quantified and assessed the variance in colour within and between species. Reflectance spectra of flowers from ten plant species and plumage of 20 bird species were measured using a spectrometer, and reflectance (i.e. brightness) and tetrahedral colour-space coordinates were calculated. analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses indicate that there is far more variation in the colours of birds and flowers between species (>77%) than within species. A Mean Absolute Deviation from the Mean test was applied to indicate the sampling replication required for each species. Tetrahedral coordinates were sampled precisely with only one individual per species. Greater replication was needed to sample reflectance with the desired precision, particularly for darker coloured species. Our findings will allow researchers to allocate their sampling effort in a way that maximises the precision of their colour data collection. The fact that only a few replicates per species are necessary will greatly facilitate broad cross-species comparisons of colour in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920972735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bij.12402

DO - 10.1111/bij.12402

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 69

EP - 81

JO - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

T2 - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

JF - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

SN - 0024-4066

IS - 1

ER -