Safety of opioid patch initiation in Australian residential aged care

Svetla Gadzhanova, Elizabeth E. Roughead, Lisa G. Pont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)


OBJECTIVE: To explore opioid use by aged care facility residents before and after initiation of transdermal opioid patches.

DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort study, analysing pharmacy data on individual patient supply between 1 July 2008 and 30 September 2013.

SETTING: Sixty residential aged care facilities in New South Wales.

PARTICIPANTS: Residents receiving an initial opioid patch during the study period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of residents who were opioid-naive in the 4 weeks prior to patch initiation was determined. In addition, the patch strength at initiation and the daily dose of transdermal patches and of additional opioids 1 month after initiation were determined.

RESULTS: An opioid patch was initiated in 596 of 5297 residents (11.3%: 2.6% fentanyl, 8.7% buprenorphine) in the 60 residential aged care facilities. The mean age at initiation was 87 years, and 74% of the recipients were women. The proportion of recipients who were opioid-naive before patch initiation was 34% for fentanyl and 49% for buprenorphine. Most were initiated at the lowest available patch strength, and the dose was up-titrated after initiation. Around 15% of fentanyl users and 10% of buprenorphine users needed additional regular opioids after patch initiation.

CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest some inappropriate initiation of opioid patches in Australian residential aged care facilities. Contrary to best practice, a third of residents initiated on fentanyl patches were opioid-naive in the 4 weeks before initiation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298.e1-298.e6
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 5 Oct 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of opioid patch initiation in Australian residential aged care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this