Scoping Meta-Review: Introducing a New Methodology

Pooria Sarrami-Foroushani, Joanne Travaglia, Deborah Debono, Robyn Clay-Williams, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the "scoping meta-review" (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta-review to establish an evidence-based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high-level evidence provided by systematic reviews.

LanguageEnglish
Pages77-81
Number of pages5
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Databases
Research Personnel
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

Sarrami-Foroushani, Pooria ; Travaglia, Joanne ; Debono, Deborah ; Clay-Williams, Robyn ; Braithwaite, Jeffrey. / Scoping Meta-Review : Introducing a New Methodology. In: Clinical and Translational Science. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 77-81.
@article{641f0daa4dfb4f2ca53c27b694a3ccc6,
title = "Scoping Meta-Review: Introducing a New Methodology",
abstract = "For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the {"}scoping meta-review{"} (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta-review to establish an evidence-based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high-level evidence provided by systematic reviews.",
author = "Pooria Sarrami-Foroushani and Joanne Travaglia and Deborah Debono and Robyn Clay-Williams and Jeffrey Braithwaite",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12188",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "77--81",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Scoping Meta-Review : Introducing a New Methodology. / Sarrami-Foroushani, Pooria; Travaglia, Joanne; Debono, Deborah; Clay-Williams, Robyn; Braithwaite, Jeffrey.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 77-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scoping Meta-Review

T2 - Clinical and Translational Science

AU - Sarrami-Foroushani, Pooria

AU - Travaglia, Joanne

AU - Debono, Deborah

AU - Clay-Williams, Robyn

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the "scoping meta-review" (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta-review to establish an evidence-based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high-level evidence provided by systematic reviews.

AB - For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the "scoping meta-review" (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta-review to establish an evidence-based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high-level evidence provided by systematic reviews.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922645169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12188

DO - 10.1111/cts.12188

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 77

EP - 81

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 1

ER -