Screening for dementia in primary care: A comparison of the GPCOG and the MMSE

Henry Brodaty*, Michael H. Connors, Clement Loy, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Nigel Stocks, Jane Gunn, Karen E. Mate, C. Dimity Pond

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Aims: The General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) is a brief cognitive test. This study compared the GPCOG to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the most widely used test, in terms of their ability to detect likely dementia in primary care. Methods: General practitioners across three states in Australia recruited 2,028 elderly patients from the community. A research nurse administered the GPCOG and the MMSE, as well as the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly Cognitive Scale-Revised that we used to define likely dementia. Results: Overall, the GPCOG and the MMSE were similarly effective at detecting likely dementia. The GPCOG, however, had a higher sensitivity than the MMSE when using published cutpoints. Conclusion: The GPCOG is an effective screening tool for dementia in primary care. It appears to be a viable alternative to the MMSE, whilst also requiring less time to administer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-330
Number of pages8
JournalDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Volume42
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Assessment
  • Cognitive test
  • Dementia
  • General practice
  • General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition
  • Mini-Mental State Examination
  • Primary care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screening for dementia in primary care: A comparison of the GPCOG and the MMSE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this