Scrutinising the argument for reducing penalty rates

Joseph McIvor, Raymond Markey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The issue of weekend penalty rates has been an important area of contention in Australian industrial relations in recent times, with employers seeking reductions in penalty rates or their elimination altogether. In its recent review of Modern Awards, the Fair Work Commission decided to reduce Sunday penalty rates in a number of awards. The decision was in part informed by a recent review by the Productivity Commission, which had gone so far as to recommend that penalty rates on Sundays be made equivalent to Saturdays. In this article, we examine two of the main justifications for reductions in Sunday penalty rates. We begin by examining the question of whether Sundays are still ‘special’ in a sense likely to warrant penalty rates additional to those on a Saturday. We find that Sundays remain the least preferred day to work, are most valued by employees, and occupy a particular role in time shared with family. We also examine the key claim by the Productivity Commission – accepted by the Fair Work Commission – that a reduction in penalty rates would necessarily result in increased employment in the industries considered. We find that there is little direct empirical evidence for this, and that minimum wage studies have been largely unable to find a net employment effect. The relationship among wages, policy and unemployment is complex in a way that defies simple predictions. There is a need for more direct evidence of the effects of penalty rates on employment.

LanguageEnglish
Pages652-669
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Industrial Relations
Volume59
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Penalty
Productivity
Minimum wage
Empirical evidence
Employers
Prediction
Justification
Employment effects
Industrial relations
Unemployment
Employees
Warrants
Industry
Wage policy

Keywords

  • Minimum wage
  • penalty rates
  • productivity commission
  • unemployment
  • weekend work

Cite this

@article{0c6e0195c1fa483085e20797bd22ef93,
title = "Scrutinising the argument for reducing penalty rates",
abstract = "The issue of weekend penalty rates has been an important area of contention in Australian industrial relations in recent times, with employers seeking reductions in penalty rates or their elimination altogether. In its recent review of Modern Awards, the Fair Work Commission decided to reduce Sunday penalty rates in a number of awards. The decision was in part informed by a recent review by the Productivity Commission, which had gone so far as to recommend that penalty rates on Sundays be made equivalent to Saturdays. In this article, we examine two of the main justifications for reductions in Sunday penalty rates. We begin by examining the question of whether Sundays are still ‘special’ in a sense likely to warrant penalty rates additional to those on a Saturday. We find that Sundays remain the least preferred day to work, are most valued by employees, and occupy a particular role in time shared with family. We also examine the key claim by the Productivity Commission – accepted by the Fair Work Commission – that a reduction in penalty rates would necessarily result in increased employment in the industries considered. We find that there is little direct empirical evidence for this, and that minimum wage studies have been largely unable to find a net employment effect. The relationship among wages, policy and unemployment is complex in a way that defies simple predictions. There is a need for more direct evidence of the effects of penalty rates on employment.",
keywords = "Minimum wage, penalty rates, productivity commission, unemployment, weekend work",
author = "Joseph McIvor and Raymond Markey",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022185617704012",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "652--669",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0022-1856",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "5",

}

Scrutinising the argument for reducing penalty rates. / McIvor, Joseph; Markey, Raymond.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 59, No. 5, 01.11.2017, p. 652-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scrutinising the argument for reducing penalty rates

AU - McIvor, Joseph

AU - Markey, Raymond

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The issue of weekend penalty rates has been an important area of contention in Australian industrial relations in recent times, with employers seeking reductions in penalty rates or their elimination altogether. In its recent review of Modern Awards, the Fair Work Commission decided to reduce Sunday penalty rates in a number of awards. The decision was in part informed by a recent review by the Productivity Commission, which had gone so far as to recommend that penalty rates on Sundays be made equivalent to Saturdays. In this article, we examine two of the main justifications for reductions in Sunday penalty rates. We begin by examining the question of whether Sundays are still ‘special’ in a sense likely to warrant penalty rates additional to those on a Saturday. We find that Sundays remain the least preferred day to work, are most valued by employees, and occupy a particular role in time shared with family. We also examine the key claim by the Productivity Commission – accepted by the Fair Work Commission – that a reduction in penalty rates would necessarily result in increased employment in the industries considered. We find that there is little direct empirical evidence for this, and that minimum wage studies have been largely unable to find a net employment effect. The relationship among wages, policy and unemployment is complex in a way that defies simple predictions. There is a need for more direct evidence of the effects of penalty rates on employment.

AB - The issue of weekend penalty rates has been an important area of contention in Australian industrial relations in recent times, with employers seeking reductions in penalty rates or their elimination altogether. In its recent review of Modern Awards, the Fair Work Commission decided to reduce Sunday penalty rates in a number of awards. The decision was in part informed by a recent review by the Productivity Commission, which had gone so far as to recommend that penalty rates on Sundays be made equivalent to Saturdays. In this article, we examine two of the main justifications for reductions in Sunday penalty rates. We begin by examining the question of whether Sundays are still ‘special’ in a sense likely to warrant penalty rates additional to those on a Saturday. We find that Sundays remain the least preferred day to work, are most valued by employees, and occupy a particular role in time shared with family. We also examine the key claim by the Productivity Commission – accepted by the Fair Work Commission – that a reduction in penalty rates would necessarily result in increased employment in the industries considered. We find that there is little direct empirical evidence for this, and that minimum wage studies have been largely unable to find a net employment effect. The relationship among wages, policy and unemployment is complex in a way that defies simple predictions. There is a need for more direct evidence of the effects of penalty rates on employment.

KW - Minimum wage

KW - penalty rates

KW - productivity commission

KW - unemployment

KW - weekend work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034446865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022185617704012

DO - 10.1177/0022185617704012

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 652

EP - 669

JO - Journal of Industrial Relations

T2 - Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0022-1856

IS - 5

ER -