Self-compassion and hope in the context of body image disturbance and distress in breast cancer survivors

Natasha Todorov, Kerry A. Sherman, Christopher J. Kilby, Breast Cancer Network Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Greater hope and self-compassion have individually been associated with lower psychological distress in women with breast cancer. Self-compassion is also associated with lower body image distress in this population, yet it is unknown whether hope also has this association. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which hope accounts for body image distress and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors alone, and in direct comparison to self-compassion. Method: A total of 195 women were recruited from the Breast Cancer Network Australia and completed a cross-sectional online anonymous questionnaire containing self-report measures of body image (Body Image Scale), self-compassion (Self Compassion Scale-SF), hope (State Hope Scale), psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress; DASS), and demographic/medical questions. Results: Self-compassion and hope were inversely correlated with all outcomes. Hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated that self-compassion and hope uniquely explained variance in all outcomes with different magnitudes of strength. Comparison of standardised betas indicated (a) Body image distress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.355) vs hope (Bstd = −.161); (b) Stress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.562) vs hope (Bstd = −.287); (c) Depression—hope (Bstd = −.447) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.374); (d) Anxiety—hope (Bstd = −.406) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.249). Conclusion: The unique contribution of self-compassion and hope in explaining body image distress and psychological distress suggests that combined, hope-focused components of therapy may be suitable additions to the growing array of self-compassion–based psychosocial interventions to address body image and psychological distress concerns of women with breast cancer.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2025–2032
Number of pages8
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume28
Issue number10
Early online date1 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Hope
Body Image
Ego
Survivors
Breast Neoplasms
Psychology
Anxiety
Depression

Keywords

  • body image
  • breast cancer
  • cancer
  • hope
  • oncology
  • psychology
  • self-compassion
  • survivor

Cite this

@article{3642e2aa1e444b94b5a22d6e138c5008,
title = "Self-compassion and hope in the context of body image disturbance and distress in breast cancer survivors",
abstract = "Objective: Greater hope and self-compassion have individually been associated with lower psychological distress in women with breast cancer. Self-compassion is also associated with lower body image distress in this population, yet it is unknown whether hope also has this association. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which hope accounts for body image distress and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors alone, and in direct comparison to self-compassion. Method: A total of 195 women were recruited from the Breast Cancer Network Australia and completed a cross-sectional online anonymous questionnaire containing self-report measures of body image (Body Image Scale), self-compassion (Self Compassion Scale-SF), hope (State Hope Scale), psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress; DASS), and demographic/medical questions. Results: Self-compassion and hope were inversely correlated with all outcomes. Hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated that self-compassion and hope uniquely explained variance in all outcomes with different magnitudes of strength. Comparison of standardised betas indicated (a) Body image distress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.355) vs hope (Bstd = −.161); (b) Stress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.562) vs hope (Bstd = −.287); (c) Depression—hope (Bstd = −.447) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.374); (d) Anxiety—hope (Bstd = −.406) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.249). Conclusion: The unique contribution of self-compassion and hope in explaining body image distress and psychological distress suggests that combined, hope-focused components of therapy may be suitable additions to the growing array of self-compassion–based psychosocial interventions to address body image and psychological distress concerns of women with breast cancer.",
keywords = "body image, breast cancer, cancer, hope, oncology, psychology, self-compassion, survivor",
author = "Natasha Todorov and Sherman, {Kerry A.} and Kilby, {Christopher J.} and {Breast Cancer Network Australia}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/pon.5187",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2025–2032",
journal = "Psycho‐Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "10",

}

Self-compassion and hope in the context of body image disturbance and distress in breast cancer survivors. / Todorov, Natasha; Sherman, Kerry A.; Kilby, Christopher J.; Breast Cancer Network Australia.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 28, No. 10, 10.2019, p. 2025–2032.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-compassion and hope in the context of body image disturbance and distress in breast cancer survivors

AU - Todorov, Natasha

AU - Sherman, Kerry A.

AU - Kilby, Christopher J.

AU - Breast Cancer Network Australia

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Objective: Greater hope and self-compassion have individually been associated with lower psychological distress in women with breast cancer. Self-compassion is also associated with lower body image distress in this population, yet it is unknown whether hope also has this association. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which hope accounts for body image distress and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors alone, and in direct comparison to self-compassion. Method: A total of 195 women were recruited from the Breast Cancer Network Australia and completed a cross-sectional online anonymous questionnaire containing self-report measures of body image (Body Image Scale), self-compassion (Self Compassion Scale-SF), hope (State Hope Scale), psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress; DASS), and demographic/medical questions. Results: Self-compassion and hope were inversely correlated with all outcomes. Hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated that self-compassion and hope uniquely explained variance in all outcomes with different magnitudes of strength. Comparison of standardised betas indicated (a) Body image distress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.355) vs hope (Bstd = −.161); (b) Stress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.562) vs hope (Bstd = −.287); (c) Depression—hope (Bstd = −.447) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.374); (d) Anxiety—hope (Bstd = −.406) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.249). Conclusion: The unique contribution of self-compassion and hope in explaining body image distress and psychological distress suggests that combined, hope-focused components of therapy may be suitable additions to the growing array of self-compassion–based psychosocial interventions to address body image and psychological distress concerns of women with breast cancer.

AB - Objective: Greater hope and self-compassion have individually been associated with lower psychological distress in women with breast cancer. Self-compassion is also associated with lower body image distress in this population, yet it is unknown whether hope also has this association. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which hope accounts for body image distress and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors alone, and in direct comparison to self-compassion. Method: A total of 195 women were recruited from the Breast Cancer Network Australia and completed a cross-sectional online anonymous questionnaire containing self-report measures of body image (Body Image Scale), self-compassion (Self Compassion Scale-SF), hope (State Hope Scale), psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress; DASS), and demographic/medical questions. Results: Self-compassion and hope were inversely correlated with all outcomes. Hierarchical linear regression analyses indicated that self-compassion and hope uniquely explained variance in all outcomes with different magnitudes of strength. Comparison of standardised betas indicated (a) Body image distress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.355) vs hope (Bstd = −.161); (b) Stress—self-compassion (Bstd = −.562) vs hope (Bstd = −.287); (c) Depression—hope (Bstd = −.447) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.374); (d) Anxiety—hope (Bstd = −.406) vs self-compassion (Bstd = −.249). Conclusion: The unique contribution of self-compassion and hope in explaining body image distress and psychological distress suggests that combined, hope-focused components of therapy may be suitable additions to the growing array of self-compassion–based psychosocial interventions to address body image and psychological distress concerns of women with breast cancer.

KW - body image

KW - breast cancer

KW - cancer

KW - hope

KW - oncology

KW - psychology

KW - self-compassion

KW - survivor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071171406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.5187

DO - 10.1002/pon.5187

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2025

EP - 2032

JO - Psycho‐Oncology

T2 - Psycho‐Oncology

JF - Psycho‐Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 10

ER -