Abstract
The self-deceived are usually held to be moral responsible for their state. I argue that this attribution of responsibility makes sense only against the background of the traditional conception of self-deception, a conception that is now widely rejected. In its place, a new conception of self-deception has been articulated, which requires neither intentional action by self-deceived agents, nor that they posses contradictory beliefs. This new conception has neither need nor place for attributions of moral responsibility to the self-deceived in paradigmatic cases. Accordingly, we should take the final step toward abandoning the traditional conception, and drop the automatic attribution of responsibility. Self-deception is simply a kind of mistake, and has no more necessary connection to culpability than have other intellectual errors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 294-311 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Ratio |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-deception and moral responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver