TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-repair of cracks and defects in clay
T2 - a review of evidence, mechanisms, theories and nomenclature
AU - El-Zein, Abbas
AU - Airey, David
AU - Yu, Bowei
AU - Alipour Esgandani, Golnaz
AU - Proust, Gwénaëlle
AU - Dias-da-Costa, Daniel
AU - Gao, Yifei
AU - Gan, Yixiang
AU - Chen, Shunzhi
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Clay minerals and clayey soils have been extensively researched over the last century leading to a rich and still evolving corpus of knowledge on clay chemistry, microstructure and macroscopic behaviour. Clay has the ability, under certain conditions, to spontaneously repair its cracks. However, despite ample evidence, clay self-repair remains understudied and under-theorised. For example, the majority of experimental studies discussing clay self-repair infer its existence from changes to macroscopic properties assumed to be caused by self-repair, and only a small number of studies have attempted to observe self-repair directly. This paper reviews the literature on clay self-repair. First, it situates clay self-repair within the broader context of self-repairing material. Next, autogenous self-repair of clay, under wet-dry cycles, freeze–thaw cycles and deep-ground consolidation, is presented focusing on evidence, driving mechanisms and key variables of influence. Next, theories of clay self-repair proposed in the literature are discussed, highlighting their scope and limitations, as well as the extent to which they have been validated by experimental observations. Key gaps in current knowledge of clay self-repair are highlighted and ways in which they can be addressed in future research are proposed. Finally, a nomenclature distinguishing between different kinds of clay self-repair is proposed based on eight different attributes.
AB - Clay minerals and clayey soils have been extensively researched over the last century leading to a rich and still evolving corpus of knowledge on clay chemistry, microstructure and macroscopic behaviour. Clay has the ability, under certain conditions, to spontaneously repair its cracks. However, despite ample evidence, clay self-repair remains understudied and under-theorised. For example, the majority of experimental studies discussing clay self-repair infer its existence from changes to macroscopic properties assumed to be caused by self-repair, and only a small number of studies have attempted to observe self-repair directly. This paper reviews the literature on clay self-repair. First, it situates clay self-repair within the broader context of self-repairing material. Next, autogenous self-repair of clay, under wet-dry cycles, freeze–thaw cycles and deep-ground consolidation, is presented focusing on evidence, driving mechanisms and key variables of influence. Next, theories of clay self-repair proposed in the literature are discussed, highlighting their scope and limitations, as well as the extent to which they have been validated by experimental observations. Key gaps in current knowledge of clay self-repair are highlighted and ways in which they can be addressed in future research are proposed. Finally, a nomenclature distinguishing between different kinds of clay self-repair is proposed based on eight different attributes.
KW - Clay
KW - Clay liners
KW - Desiccation
KW - Montmorillonite
KW - Self-healing
KW - Self-repair
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118542293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170104192
U2 - 10.1007/s11440-021-01382-8
DO - 10.1007/s11440-021-01382-8
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85118542293
SN - 1861-1125
VL - 16
SP - 3741
EP - 3760
JO - Acta Geotechnica
JF - Acta Geotechnica
IS - 12
ER -