Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article we review the history of the scientific use of self‐recording and conclude that there are three basic methods: (a) interval‐contingent, in which respondents report on their experiences at regular intervals, (b) signal‐contingent, in which respondents report when signaled, and (c) event‐contingent, in which respondents report whenever a defined event occurs. We then discuss the relative merits of these techniques for answering different questions. Finally, we note that self‐recording of small events is a departure from the science of psychology as typically practiced, requiring an acceptance of reality as defined by respondents.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 339-354 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of personality |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1991 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self‐Recording of Everyday Life Events: Origins, Types, and Uses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver