Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: Beyond the internal/external feature distinction

Kevin R. Brooks, Richard I. Kemp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Previous studies of face recognition and of face matching have shown a general improvement for the processing of internal features as a face becomes more familiar to the participant. In this study, we used a psychophysical two-alternative forced-choice paradigm to investigate thresholds for the detection of a displacement of the eyes, nose, mouth, or ears for familiar and unfamiliar faces. No clear division between internal and external features was observed. Rather, for familiar (compared to unfamiliar) faces participants were more sensitive to displacements of internal features such as the eyes or the nose; yet, for our third internal feature-the mouth-no such difference was observed. Despite large displacements, many subjects were unable to perform above chance when stimuli involved shifts in the position of the ears. These results are consistent with the proposal that familiarity effects may be mediated by the construction of a robust representation of a face, although the involvement of attention in the encoding of face stimuli cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, these effects are mediated by information from a spatial configuration of features, rather than by purely feature-based information.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1646-1659
Number of pages14
JournalPerception
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Face recognition
Processing
Nose
Ear
Mouth

Cite this

@article{ee9e9a35d8e64d83bfbc4290b25b19c5,
title = "Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: Beyond the internal/external feature distinction",
abstract = "Previous studies of face recognition and of face matching have shown a general improvement for the processing of internal features as a face becomes more familiar to the participant. In this study, we used a psychophysical two-alternative forced-choice paradigm to investigate thresholds for the detection of a displacement of the eyes, nose, mouth, or ears for familiar and unfamiliar faces. No clear division between internal and external features was observed. Rather, for familiar (compared to unfamiliar) faces participants were more sensitive to displacements of internal features such as the eyes or the nose; yet, for our third internal feature-the mouth-no such difference was observed. Despite large displacements, many subjects were unable to perform above chance when stimuli involved shifts in the position of the ears. These results are consistent with the proposal that familiarity effects may be mediated by the construction of a robust representation of a face, although the involvement of attention in the encoding of face stimuli cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, these effects are mediated by information from a spatial configuration of features, rather than by purely feature-based information.",
author = "Brooks, {Kevin R.} and Kemp, {Richard I.}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1068/p5675",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1646--1659",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion",
number = "11",

}

Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces : Beyond the internal/external feature distinction. / Brooks, Kevin R.; Kemp, Richard I.

In: Perception, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2007, p. 1646-1659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces

T2 - Perception

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

AU - Kemp, Richard I.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Previous studies of face recognition and of face matching have shown a general improvement for the processing of internal features as a face becomes more familiar to the participant. In this study, we used a psychophysical two-alternative forced-choice paradigm to investigate thresholds for the detection of a displacement of the eyes, nose, mouth, or ears for familiar and unfamiliar faces. No clear division between internal and external features was observed. Rather, for familiar (compared to unfamiliar) faces participants were more sensitive to displacements of internal features such as the eyes or the nose; yet, for our third internal feature-the mouth-no such difference was observed. Despite large displacements, many subjects were unable to perform above chance when stimuli involved shifts in the position of the ears. These results are consistent with the proposal that familiarity effects may be mediated by the construction of a robust representation of a face, although the involvement of attention in the encoding of face stimuli cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, these effects are mediated by information from a spatial configuration of features, rather than by purely feature-based information.

AB - Previous studies of face recognition and of face matching have shown a general improvement for the processing of internal features as a face becomes more familiar to the participant. In this study, we used a psychophysical two-alternative forced-choice paradigm to investigate thresholds for the detection of a displacement of the eyes, nose, mouth, or ears for familiar and unfamiliar faces. No clear division between internal and external features was observed. Rather, for familiar (compared to unfamiliar) faces participants were more sensitive to displacements of internal features such as the eyes or the nose; yet, for our third internal feature-the mouth-no such difference was observed. Despite large displacements, many subjects were unable to perform above chance when stimuli involved shifts in the position of the ears. These results are consistent with the proposal that familiarity effects may be mediated by the construction of a robust representation of a face, although the involvement of attention in the encoding of face stimuli cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, these effects are mediated by information from a spatial configuration of features, rather than by purely feature-based information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349052342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/p5675

DO - 10.1068/p5675

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1646

EP - 1659

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 11

ER -