Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sensor location influences the associations between IMU and motion capture measurements of impact landing in healthy male and female runners at multiple running speeds

Eoin W. Doyle*, Tim L. A. Doyle, Jason Bonacci, Joel T. Fuller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between inertial measurement unit (IMU) acceleration at multiple body locations and 3D motion capture impact landing measures in runners. Thirty healthy runners ran on an instrumented treadmill at five running speeds (9–17 km/h) during 3D motion capture. Axial and resultant acceleration were collected from IMUs at the distal and proximal tibia, distal femur and sacrum. Relationships between peak acceleration from each IMU location and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) peak force and loading rate, impact peak and instantaneous vertical loading rate (IVLR) were investigated using linear mixed models. Acceleration was positively related to IVLR at all lower limb locations (p < 0.01). Models predicted a 1.9–3.2 g peak acceleration change at the tibia and distal femur, corresponding with a 10% IVLR change. Impact peak was positively related to acceleration at the distal femur only (p < 0.01). PFJ peak force was positively related to acceleration at the distal (p = 0.03) and proximal tibia (p = 0.03). PFJ loading rate was positively related to the tibia and femur acceleration in males only (p < 0.01). These findings suggest multiple IMU lower limb locations are viable for measuring peak acceleration during running as a meaningful indicator of IVLR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1514-1528
Number of pages15
JournalSports Biomechanics
Volume24
Issue number6
Early online date8 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • gait analysis
  • ground reaction force
  • inertial measurement unit
  • Running

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensor location influences the associations between IMU and motion capture measurements of impact landing in healthy male and female runners at multiple running speeds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this