Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)

Alexander Pollatsek*, Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1485-1489
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • alternating case
  • attention
  • eye fixation
  • eye movements
  • linguistic information
  • modeling
  • parafoveal preview
  • parallel processing
  • pretarget viewing
  • reading
  • time course
  • visibility
  • words

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this