Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)

Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D. Reichle; Keith Rayner

doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)

Alexander Pollatsek^*, Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1485-1489
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume	32
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485
Publication status	Published - 2006
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

alternating case
attention
eye fixation
eye movements
linguistic information
modeling
parafoveal preview
parallel processing
pretarget viewing
reading
time course
visibility
words

Access to Document

10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

Cite this

Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1485-1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

@article{ec6b48fc89ba4911952bf72ca9c5a9e0,

title = "Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)",

abstract = "A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.",

keywords = "alternating case, attention, eye fixation, eye movements, linguistic information, modeling, parafoveal preview, parallel processing, pretarget viewing, reading, time course, visibility, words",

author = "Alexander Pollatsek and Reichle, \{Erik D.\} and Keith Rayner",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "1485--1489",

journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",

issn = "0096-1523",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "6",

}

Pollatsek, A, Reichle, ED & Rayner, K 2006, 'Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1485-1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). / Pollatsek, Alexander; Reichle, Erik D.; Rayner, Keith.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2006, p. 1485-1489.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading

T2 - a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)

AU - Pollatsek, Alexander

AU - Reichle, Erik D.

AU - Rayner, Keith

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.

AB - A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach (2005) reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.

KW - alternating case

KW - attention

KW - eye fixation

KW - eye movements

KW - linguistic information

KW - modeling

KW - parafoveal preview

KW - parallel processing

KW - pretarget viewing

KW - reading

KW - time course

KW - visibility

KW - words

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33845619952

U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485

M3 - Article

C2 - 17154787

AN - SCOPUS:33845619952

SN - 0096-1523

VL - 32

SP - 1485

EP - 1489

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

IS - 6

ER -

Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this