Abstract
Substantial facts (or states of affairs) are not well-understood entities. Many philosophers object to their existence on this basis. Yet facts, if they can be understood, promise to do a lot of philosophical work: they can be used to construct theories of property possession and truthmaking, for example. Here, I give a formal theory of facts, including negative and logically complex facts. I provide a theory of reduction similar to that of the typed λ-calculus and use it to provide identity conditions for facts. This theory validates truthmaker maximalism: it provides truthmakers for all truths. I then show how the usual truth-in-a-model relation can be replaced by two relations: one between models and facts, saying that a given fact obtains relative to the model, and the other between facts and propositions: the truthmaking relation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-54 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Philosophical Logic |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- λ-calculus
- Facts
- Negative facts
- Ontology
- Properties
- Reduction
- States of affairs
- Truthmaking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Setting the Facts Straight'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver