Sexual dimorphism in snakes

different reproductive roles favour different body plans

X. Bonnet*, R. Shine, G. Naulleau, M. Vacher-Vallas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because snakes have a highly simplified morphology, and many species have a wide (and broadly overlapping) range of adult body sizes within each sex, they offer an excellent opportunity to compare body composition of males and females. Evolutionary theory predicts chat particular body components should be differentially enlarged in the two sexes. For example, we might expect the reproductive success of females to be enhanced by enlargement of organ systems involved in the processing and storage of energy (e.g. alimentary tract, liver, fat stores) whereas males would benefit from the enlargement of systems important for mate-searching, male-male combat and sperm competition (e.g. larger mass of skeletal muscles, tail, and kidneys). Dissection of 243 specimens of three snake species (117 Vipera aspis, 43 Elaphe longissima, 83 Coluber viridflavus) broadly supported these predictions. Strong sex differences were apparent in relative sizes (masses) of all the non-gonadal body components that we weighed. For example, males consistently had more musculature (relative to body length) than did conspecific females. Dimorphism in relative muscle mass is likely to be one of the most fundamental and widespread morphological differences between males and females in the Animal Kingdom.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-183
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume265
Issue number1392
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Muscle mass
  • Sexual dimorphism
  • Sexual selection
  • Snakes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual dimorphism in snakes: different reproductive roles favour different body plans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this