Sexual selection and static allometry: the importance of function

William G. Eberhard, Rafael Lucas Rodríguez, Bernhard A. Huber, Bretta Speck, Henry Miller, Bruno A. Buzatto, Glauco Machado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many spectacular cases of biological diversity are associated with sexual selection, and structures under sexual selection often show positive static allometry: they are disproportionately large for the size of the animal’s body in larger individuals. Other sexually selected structures, however, show negative allometry or isometry. Theory fails to account for this variation and recent summaries do not agree regarding the frequency of positive allometry in sexually selected structures. We propose explanations for why sexually selected structures with different functions (courtship, threat signals, and weapons) should differ in allometry. Positive allometry is predicted for threat structures (including most weapons) because larger individuals tend to win fights and threat signals are used to avoid unwinnable fights with larger opponents, the reproductive payoffs for contests tend to be higher for larger males, and discriminating the sizes of relatively larger traits requires greater absolute differences due to Weber’s Law of sensory physiology. Male courtship signals, in contrast, convey many types of information, much of which is not consistently related to male size, so positive allometry is expected less often. We tested these predictions empirically by comparing the allometries of male structures with relatively “pure” functions. Our predictions were confirmed, thus helping to explain differences in previous empirical surveys.

LanguageEnglish
Pages207-250
Number of pages44
JournalQuarterly Review of Biology
Volume93
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

allometry
sexual selection
Courtship
Weapons
Biodiversity
courtship
prediction
physiology
biodiversity
animals

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2018 by University of Chicago Press. Originally published in The Quarterly Review of Biology (2018), 93(3), pp. 207-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/699410.

Keywords

  • allometry
  • sexual selection
  • signals
  • weapons
  • Weber’s Law

Cite this

Eberhard, W. G., Rodríguez, R. L., Huber, B. A., Speck, B., Miller, H., Buzatto, B. A., & Machado, G. (2018). Sexual selection and static allometry: the importance of function. Quarterly Review of Biology, 93(3), 207-250. https://doi.org/10.1086/699410
Eberhard, William G. ; Rodríguez, Rafael Lucas ; Huber, Bernhard A. ; Speck, Bretta ; Miller, Henry ; Buzatto, Bruno A. ; Machado, Glauco. / Sexual selection and static allometry : the importance of function. In: Quarterly Review of Biology. 2018 ; Vol. 93, No. 3. pp. 207-250.
@article{d6398987e1df4e56b6d64b2cfa496b8c,
title = "Sexual selection and static allometry: the importance of function",
abstract = "Many spectacular cases of biological diversity are associated with sexual selection, and structures under sexual selection often show positive static allometry: they are disproportionately large for the size of the animal’s body in larger individuals. Other sexually selected structures, however, show negative allometry or isometry. Theory fails to account for this variation and recent summaries do not agree regarding the frequency of positive allometry in sexually selected structures. We propose explanations for why sexually selected structures with different functions (courtship, threat signals, and weapons) should differ in allometry. Positive allometry is predicted for threat structures (including most weapons) because larger individuals tend to win fights and threat signals are used to avoid unwinnable fights with larger opponents, the reproductive payoffs for contests tend to be higher for larger males, and discriminating the sizes of relatively larger traits requires greater absolute differences due to Weber’s Law of sensory physiology. Male courtship signals, in contrast, convey many types of information, much of which is not consistently related to male size, so positive allometry is expected less often. We tested these predictions empirically by comparing the allometries of male structures with relatively “pure” functions. Our predictions were confirmed, thus helping to explain differences in previous empirical surveys.",
keywords = "allometry, sexual selection, signals, weapons, Weber’s Law",
author = "Eberhard, {William G.} and Rodr{\'i}guez, {Rafael Lucas} and Huber, {Bernhard A.} and Bretta Speck and Henry Miller and Buzatto, {Bruno A.} and Glauco Machado",
note = "Copyright 2018 by University of Chicago Press. Originally published in The Quarterly Review of Biology (2018), 93(3), pp. 207-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/699410.",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1086/699410",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "207--250",
journal = "Quarterly Review of Biology",
issn = "0033-5770",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

Eberhard, WG, Rodríguez, RL, Huber, BA, Speck, B, Miller, H, Buzatto, BA & Machado, G 2018, 'Sexual selection and static allometry: the importance of function', Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 207-250. https://doi.org/10.1086/699410

Sexual selection and static allometry : the importance of function. / Eberhard, William G.; Rodríguez, Rafael Lucas; Huber, Bernhard A.; Speck, Bretta; Miller, Henry; Buzatto, Bruno A.; Machado, Glauco.

In: Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 93, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 207-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual selection and static allometry

T2 - Quarterly Review of Biology

AU - Eberhard, William G.

AU - Rodríguez, Rafael Lucas

AU - Huber, Bernhard A.

AU - Speck, Bretta

AU - Miller, Henry

AU - Buzatto, Bruno A.

AU - Machado, Glauco

N1 - Copyright 2018 by University of Chicago Press. Originally published in The Quarterly Review of Biology (2018), 93(3), pp. 207-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/699410.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Many spectacular cases of biological diversity are associated with sexual selection, and structures under sexual selection often show positive static allometry: they are disproportionately large for the size of the animal’s body in larger individuals. Other sexually selected structures, however, show negative allometry or isometry. Theory fails to account for this variation and recent summaries do not agree regarding the frequency of positive allometry in sexually selected structures. We propose explanations for why sexually selected structures with different functions (courtship, threat signals, and weapons) should differ in allometry. Positive allometry is predicted for threat structures (including most weapons) because larger individuals tend to win fights and threat signals are used to avoid unwinnable fights with larger opponents, the reproductive payoffs for contests tend to be higher for larger males, and discriminating the sizes of relatively larger traits requires greater absolute differences due to Weber’s Law of sensory physiology. Male courtship signals, in contrast, convey many types of information, much of which is not consistently related to male size, so positive allometry is expected less often. We tested these predictions empirically by comparing the allometries of male structures with relatively “pure” functions. Our predictions were confirmed, thus helping to explain differences in previous empirical surveys.

AB - Many spectacular cases of biological diversity are associated with sexual selection, and structures under sexual selection often show positive static allometry: they are disproportionately large for the size of the animal’s body in larger individuals. Other sexually selected structures, however, show negative allometry or isometry. Theory fails to account for this variation and recent summaries do not agree regarding the frequency of positive allometry in sexually selected structures. We propose explanations for why sexually selected structures with different functions (courtship, threat signals, and weapons) should differ in allometry. Positive allometry is predicted for threat structures (including most weapons) because larger individuals tend to win fights and threat signals are used to avoid unwinnable fights with larger opponents, the reproductive payoffs for contests tend to be higher for larger males, and discriminating the sizes of relatively larger traits requires greater absolute differences due to Weber’s Law of sensory physiology. Male courtship signals, in contrast, convey many types of information, much of which is not consistently related to male size, so positive allometry is expected less often. We tested these predictions empirically by comparing the allometries of male structures with relatively “pure” functions. Our predictions were confirmed, thus helping to explain differences in previous empirical surveys.

KW - allometry

KW - sexual selection

KW - signals

KW - weapons

KW - Weber’s Law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051404823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/699410

DO - 10.1086/699410

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 207

EP - 250

JO - Quarterly Review of Biology

JF - Quarterly Review of Biology

SN - 0033-5770

IS - 3

ER -

Eberhard WG, Rodríguez RL, Huber BA, Speck B, Miller H, Buzatto BA et al. Sexual selection and static allometry: the importance of function. Quarterly Review of Biology. 2018 Sep;93(3):207-250. https://doi.org/10.1086/699410