Sexual size dimorphism and reproductive investment by female spiders: A comparative analysis

John Prenter*, Robert W. Elwood, W. Ian Montgomery

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    108 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We investigate the association between female reproductive investment, absolute size, and sexual size dimorphism in spiders to test the predictions of the fecundity-advantage hypothesis. The relationships between absolute size and sexual size dimorphism and aspects of female reproductive output are examined in comparative analyses using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We provide support for the idea that allometry for sexual dimorphism is the result of variation in female size more so than male size. Regression analyses suggest selection for increased fecundity in females. We argue that fecundity selection provides the only general explanation for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1987-1994
    Number of pages8
    JournalEvolution
    Volume53
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 1999

    Keywords

    • Allometry
    • Araneae
    • Body size
    • Clutch size
    • Comparative analysis
    • Female reproductive output
    • Life history
    • Phylogeny
    • Sexual dimorphism
    • Spiders

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual size dimorphism and reproductive investment by female spiders: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this