Shaping the university curriculum through partnerships and critical conversations

S. P. Fraser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

"Quality teaching", "curriculum change" and "innovative practice" are just a few of the common phrases used by university academics as a basis for defining and justifying their actions as educators and policy-makers. Yet our analysis of 25 interviews with academics revealed differences in their conceptions of these terms. While the impact of such disparity upon the clarity of discussions across campus is not known, it is likely to be significant. We suggest there is a real need for academics and developers to work together to identify the meanings behind the language of higher education. By working collaboratively and contributing individual expertise, academics and developers can develop converging understandings and better shape the university curriculum. This paper explores ways in which we can work together to achieve this goal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-17
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal for Academic Development
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • university curriculum
  • language meaning
  • quality teaching
  • curriculum change
  • innovative practice

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shaping the university curriculum through partnerships and critical conversations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this