Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shared decision making in prostate cancer screening: An update

Tim Tse*, Bosco Wu, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Simon Willcock

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Population screening of low-risk asymptomatic men for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial, and mass screening programs have not been implemented. In Australia, if a patient enquires about prostate cancer screening, The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) and the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) recommend shared decision making, taking into consideration the benefits and harms of, and alternatives for, PSA testing before an informed choice is made.1–3 Recent 16-year follow-up data from the landmark European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and developments in the diagnosis of prostate cancer with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide evolved viewpoints.4–6 In this article, the authors aim to highlight these advances for primary care physicians to facilitate the shared decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-101
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian Journal of General Practice
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shared decision making in prostate cancer screening: An update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this