Abstract
For scholars of comparative constitutional law and human rights, Singapore offers an exceptional platform in terms of the number and diversity of issues that require and excite discussions. A human rights issue less discussed is the legal situation affecting persons belonging to sexual minorities in Singapore, where consensual sexual activity between male adults continues to be a crime. The Singapore government opposes sexual minority rights development on the basis of a Singapore ‘culture’ that revolves around certain ‘shared values’. Persons belonging to sexual minorities in Singapore must therefore overcome a formidable hurdle in order to realise their right of equality, and the legal situation affecting them provides useful insight into the development of human rights and governance in Singapore in general. This paper first examines the Singapore government’s position on human rights by deconstructing Singapore ‘culture’. It then deconstructs the relevant laws affecting persons belonging to sexual minorities in Singapore and, finally, explores whether and how Singapore may develop its own jurisprudence on sexual minority rights under the framework of legitimate constitutional comparativism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 279-305 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | International Journal of Human Rights |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2-3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Constitutional comparativism
- Governance
- Homosexuality
- Human rights
- Sexual minority rights
- Shared values
- Singapore