Shelved sovereignty or invalid sovereignty? The South China Sea negotiations, 1992–2016

Jiye Kim, Daniel Druckman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


This article contributes to the current discourses on China’s diplomacy in the South China Sea disputes by asking: What does China want to achieve in the various negotiations? By comparing different versions of the multilateral Code of Conduct negotiations between 1992 and 2016, the authors find that the sovereignty issue has been shelved throughout the negotiations. We identify three factors that may account for this finding: the inconsistency of China’s official claims over time, China’s increased bargaining power, and the importance of the shelved sovereignty axiom since the era of Deng Xiaoping. The authors conclude that the normative game continues in the shadows of international norms represented by invalid sovereignty over the contested waters.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-60
Number of pages29
JournalPacific Review
Issue number1
Early online date30 Nov 2018
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020


  • China
  • negotiation
  • South China Sea disputes
  • sovereignty


Dive into the research topics of 'Shelved sovereignty or invalid sovereignty? The South China Sea negotiations, 1992–2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this