TY - JOUR
T1 - Shining a light on disparities
T2 - A comparative analysis of residential photovoltaic adoption inequality in Australia and Brazil
AU - Konzen, Gabriel
AU - Best, Rohan
AU - de Castro, Nivalde José
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.
AB - There is a growing consensus that the energy transition must also be just. In this context, the inequality in the adoption of residential photovoltaic (PV) systems is under scrutiny as solar energy adoption rises. Despite the existing evidence of the inequality in PV adoption, there is a need to examine how this issue has evolved across different contexts, particularly in developing countries. This paper aims to compare the inequality in PV adoption between Australia and Brazil over the last decade. The mix of methods includes analyzing descriptive statistics, a Solar Gini index, and regression models. The findings reveal that inequality in residential PV adoption in both countries has not changed substantially. Lower-income quintiles have faced lower adoption probabilities than higher-income groups. However, Australia demonstrates a better position, with a more equitable distribution of solar systems across income groups. The lack of inequality change suggests that technology diffusion alone may not eliminate PV access inequality for low-income groups. It emphasizes the ongoing need for targeted policies to enhance justice in solar access.
KW - Distributed generation
KW - Energy justice
KW - Gini
KW - Inequality
KW - Solar energy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210297072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103870
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103870
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210297072
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 119
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
M1 - 103870
ER -