Abstract
This study examines the impact of short-selling restrictions on futures mispricing (relative to various benchmarks) in the market for CSI 300 index futures. In mid-2015, Chinese regulators imposed a new short-selling restriction in an attempt to curb excessive stock market volatility. Results show that futures under-pricing occurs more frequently at the transaction cost levels, ranging from 0 to 1.5%, while futures over-pricing occurs less frequently at the transaction cost levels from 0 to 0.75% under the new short sale rule. The results support the hypothesis that short-selling restrictions impose costs to the arbitrage trading strategies by arbitrageurs who do not own the underlying assets in the presence of futures under-pricing (or over-pricing of the underlying assets), resulting in more persistent futures under-pricing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 179-187 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Review of Economics and Finance |
| Volume | 61 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Short-selling restrictions
- CSI 300 futures
- Index arbitrage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Short selling restrictions and index futures pricing: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver