Should clinical software be regulated?: New Australian evaluation guidelines will help inform the debate

Should clinical software be regulated? New Australian evaluation guidelines will help inform the debate

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	600-601
Number of pages	2
Journal	Medical Journal of Australia
Volume	184
Issue number	12
Publication status	Published - 19 Jun 2006

@article{9a3c7b63c1694c55b397d899e00959c5,

title = "Should clinical software be regulated?: New Australian evaluation guidelines will help inform the debate",

author = "Coiera, {Enrico W.} and Westbrook, {Johanna I.}",

year = "2006",

month = jun,

day = "19",

language = "English",

volume = "184",

pages = "600--601",

journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",

issn = "0025-729X",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should clinical software be regulated?

T2 - New Australian evaluation guidelines will help inform the debate

AU - Coiera, Enrico W.

AU - Westbrook, Johanna I.

PY - 2006/6/19

Y1 - 2006/6/19

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745433789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 16803436

AN - SCOPUS:33745433789

SN - 0025-729X

VL - 184

SP - 600

EP - 601

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

IS - 12

ER -