Should companies use the same provider for financial statement audit and assurance of extended external reports?

Meiting Lu, Roger Simnett, Shan Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Companies are increasingly reporting and assuring sustainability information. Once the decision to assure is made, a company must choose an assurance provider, but should the company use the same firm as its financial statement auditor or a different assurance provider? Lu, Simnett, and Zhou (2023) find that perceived independence concerns deter companies from choosing the same provider, while a provider’s assurance expertise and higher levels of information integration between the financial statements and the extended external report both increase the likelihood of using the same provider. Companies using the same provider for both services benefit from higher financial statement audit quality without paying significantly higher audit fees. The findings of this research are useful for companies in deciding whether to employ their financial statement audit firm to also provide assurance of extended external reports. The findings also have implications for auditors and standard-setters/regulators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)P20-P25
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Issues in Auditing
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • assurance
  • assurance expertise
  • audit
  • audit quality
  • independence
  • reporting integration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should companies use the same provider for financial statement audit and assurance of extended external reports?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this