Should tobacco and alcohol companies be allowed to influence Australia's National Drug Strategy?

Becky Freeman*, Ross MacKenzie, Mike Daube

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinionpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    22 Downloads (Pure)


    Formation of Australia's National Drug Strategy (NDS) included an extensive consultation process that was open not only to community and public health stakeholders, but also to representatives of the tobacco and alcohol industries. Australia is bound by the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which requires governments to protect tobacco control measures from interference by the tobacco industry. NDS consultation submissions made by these conflicted industries are not publicly available for scrutiny. The NDS goals are at odds with the commercial agenda of industries that support regulatory stagnation, oppose and undermine effective action, ignore and distort evidence, and prioritise profits over health.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere2721714
    Pages (from-to)1-3
    Number of pages3
    JournalPublic Health Research and Practice
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2017

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.


    Dive into the research topics of 'Should tobacco and alcohol companies be allowed to influence Australia's National Drug Strategy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this