Showing our seams: a reply to Eric Funkhouser

Neil Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent paper published in this journal, Eric Funkhouser argues that some of our beliefs have the primary function of signaling to others, rather than allowing us to navigate the world. Funkhouser’s case is persuasive. However, his account of beliefs as signals is underinclusive, omitting both beliefs that are signals to the self and less than full-fledged beliefs as signals. The latter set of beliefs, moreover, has a better claim to being considered as constituting a psychological kind in its own right than the set of beliefs Funkhouser identifies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1006
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Belief
  • Funkhouser
  • signals
  • Sterelny

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Showing our seams: a reply to Eric Funkhouser'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this