Similar but different: differences in comprehension diagnosis on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension

Danielle Colenbrander*, Lyndsey Nickels, Saskia Kohnen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Identifying reading comprehension difficulties is challenging. There are many comprehension tests to choose from, and a child's diagnosis can be influenced by various factors such as a test's format and content and the choice of diagnostic criteria. We investigate these issues with reference to the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (NARA) and the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension (YARC). Methods: Ninety-five children were assessed on both tests. Test characteristics were compared using Principal Components and Regression analyses as well as an analysis of passage content. Results: NARA comprehension scores were more dependent on decoding skills than YARC scores, but children answered more comprehension questions on the NARA and passages spanned a wider range of difficulty. Consequently, 15-34% of children received different diagnoses across tests, depending on diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of comprehension tests is essential when attempting to diagnose reading comprehension difficulties.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)403-419
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Research in Reading
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Similar but different: differences in comprehension diagnosis on the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this